SouthDownsRoyalwindermereROYAL We`ll lose this now.
Ok m8
Happy to be wrong.
The fisticuffs at the end in the away end was interesting.
by windermereROYAL » 18 Dec 2025 22:42
SouthDownsRoyalwindermereROYAL We`ll lose this now.
Ok m8
by Armadillo Roadkill » 18 Dec 2025 22:54
by windermereROYAL » 18 Dec 2025 22:59
by leon » 18 Dec 2025 23:26
John Madejski's Wallet 3 very good goals from us. And defence was prettt decent.
But fukking hell our midfield is dire. It like their scared of actually being in midfield. Just Wing and Savage sittinf in front of the back 4 trying to spray massuve long balls
Utter junk
If he can sort out our midfield tactucs, we'd be a half decent team
by tmesis » 18 Dec 2025 23:39
by Hound » 19 Dec 2025 07:21
by Fox Talbot » 19 Dec 2025 07:42
by WestYorksRoyal » 19 Dec 2025 07:44
by Stranded » 19 Dec 2025 08:55
WestYorksRoyal LR has got 10 points from his first 6, which includes a trip away to the team in 2nd. Performances not great yet; agree we seem to be treading water until the window opens, but we're pulling in points anyway. Peterborough was the only poor result, but this team has poor results in it.
What is mad is that we're only 3 points clear of the relegation zone, and it could be fewer by Sunday. We have 25 points from 20; that would normally be enough to have us 6 or 7 clear. If you factor in 2 points from our first 5, that becomes 23 points from 15 - enough to suggest we should be fine.
It's quite similar to this time last year where Hunt had an awful week in the build up to Christmas and we genuinely debated if we'd got enough points on the board to stay up under Selles. Hopefully we put last week behind us like we did then.
by PieEater » 19 Dec 2025 09:01
by Hound » 19 Dec 2025 09:07
by leon » 19 Dec 2025 09:20
WestYorksRoyal LR has got 10 points from his first 6, which includes a trip away to the team in 2nd. Performances not great yet; agree we seem to be treading water until the window opens, but we're pulling in points anyway. Peterborough was the only poor result, but this team has poor results in it.
What is mad is that we're only 3 points clear of the relegation zone, and it could be fewer by Sunday. We have 25 points from 20; that would normally be enough to have us 6 or 7 clear. If you factor in 2 points from our first 5, that becomes 23 points from 15 - enough to suggest we should be fine.
It's quite similar to this time last year where Hunt had an awful week in the build up to Christmas and we genuinely debated if we'd got enough points on the board to stay up under Selles. Hopefully we put last week behind us like we did then.
by WestYorksRoyal » 19 Dec 2025 09:23
by MR. CYNICAL » 19 Dec 2025 09:56
Royal Rother Good win.
Wilshere looks to be building an attractive footballing outfit, with some lovely passing movements and interplay.
I think that will prove to be a very decent 3 points.
by Stranded » 19 Dec 2025 10:04
MR. CYNICALRoyal Rother Good win.
Wilshere looks to be building an attractive footballing outfit, with some lovely passing movements and interplay.
I think that will prove to be a very decent 3 points.
Wish we could get a manager to build an attractive footballing outfit, instead we have someone wanting to play football from the dark ages.
All we do is pass sideways, backwards and then hoof to one of the opposition defenders.
by Snowflake Royal » 19 Dec 2025 10:23
Hound The first half was pretty dreadful in retrospect. The pen was literally our only chance of any kind which was pretty shite
We did at least create some opening second period. Flattered really by very good finishes from KE and Marriott
Time to freshen up the midfield with Fraser I think. Savage and Wing must have played nearly every minute
Still think Marriott on his own up top is a very poor idea. Him and Kelvin together though could be a decent mix to see us through to Jan. both have a few goals in them and may give us a proper target to aim for
They’d be the changes I’d make
by WestYorksRoyal » 19 Dec 2025 10:25
StrandedMR. CYNICALRoyal Rother Good win.
Wilshere looks to be building an attractive footballing outfit, with some lovely passing movements and interplay.
I think that will prove to be a very decent 3 points.
Wish we could get a manager to build an attractive footballing outfit, instead we have someone wanting to play football from the dark ages.
All we do is pass sideways, backwards and then hoof to one of the opposition defenders.
There is the argument of course that managers see the players we have and decide that that is the best way to play with their skillsets.
by Snowflake Royal » 19 Dec 2025 10:31
WestYorksRoyalStrandedMR. CYNICAL Wish we could get a manager to build an attractive footballing outfit, instead we have someone wanting to play football from the dark ages.
All we do is pass sideways, backwards and then hoof to one of the opposition defenders.
There is the argument of course that managers see the players we have and decide that that is the best way to play with their skillsets.
The Wigan podcast interview when Richardson joined said he reverted to "pub football" to keep them up in dire circumstances in his first season, before building a more direct, exciting style in the second.
I feel like that has to be the right way to go about it, we just happen to be in the "pub football" stage with the squad he inherited.
The alternative is to be purist and say your playing style is non negotiatiable. Being fair, it worked for Selles even with a tactical tweak. But those sorts of managers normally come unstuck, and I wonder if Luton would be doing better with a manager who focuses on the players available instead of the style he wants to play.
by Sutekh » 19 Dec 2025 10:33
WestYorksRoyalStrandedMR. CYNICAL Wish we could get a manager to build an attractive footballing outfit, instead we have someone wanting to play football from the dark ages.
All we do is pass sideways, backwards and then hoof to one of the opposition defenders.
There is the argument of course that managers see the players we have and decide that that is the best way to play with their skillsets.
The Wigan podcast interview when Richardson joined said he reverted to "pub football" to keep them up in dire circumstances in his first season, before building a more direct, exciting style in the second.
I feel like that has to be the right way to go about it, we just happen to be in the "pub football" stage with the squad he inherited.
The alternative is to be purist and say your playing style is non negotiatiable. Being fair, it worked for Selles even with a tactical tweak. But those sorts of managers normally come unstuck, and I wonder if Luton would be doing better with a manager who focuses on the players available instead of the style he wants to play.
by stealthpapes » 19 Dec 2025 10:36
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 593 guests
