MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

201 posts
User avatar
CountryRoyal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10697
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 13:44

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by CountryRoyal » 12 Dec 2020 22:26

Hound Couple of great bits of defending from Gibson on the highlights


Thought Gibson was excellent. A no nonsense left back, positionally very astute. Lacked attacking prowess but I can accept that so long as he’s not a liability defensively.

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11886
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by SouthDownsRoyal » 12 Dec 2020 22:38

Sutekh Happy birthday to you!



Thanks m8

User avatar
Crowbar6753
Member
Posts: 991
Joined: 17 Aug 2015 23:25

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Crowbar6753 » 12 Dec 2020 22:48

CountryRoyal
windermereROYAL
CountryRoyal Get out of jail card that one. Not really deserved but I’ll take it!!! :D


Nonsense, QPR didn`t offer anything , they hit the post ours went in. even game.


Yea exactly... an even game... the win wasn’t really deserved.


Both teams really even and it came down to one chance each...there's was a shot across goal which hit the inside of the post and rebounded to safety. Our chance was also a shot across goal, however, ours nestled into the side of the net for the winner!!
A game of really small margins.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45902
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Snowflake Royal » 12 Dec 2020 22:49

Crowbar6753
CountryRoyal
windermereROYAL
Nonsense, QPR didn`t offer anything , they hit the post ours went in. even game.


Yea exactly... an even game... the win wasn’t really deserved.


Both teams really even and it came down to one chance each...there's was a shot across goal which hit the inside of the post and rebounded to safety. Our chance was also a shot across goal, however, ours nestled into the side of the net for the winner!!
A game of really small margins.

And theirs only came from our F up. Feel like we had the better of the game tbh, although a draw would be fair.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25395
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Dec 2020 22:51

A draw is what we all would’ve taken on todays line-up.

It’s a two/three point bonus


User avatar
Ascotexgunner
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6141
Joined: 07 Jan 2012 16:23
Location: Ascot

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Ascotexgunner » 12 Dec 2020 23:12

Just as a footnote. Just how sh*t boring was qprs kit. Wearing that shirt would be a cure for insomnia.
No imagination gone into that.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25395
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Dec 2020 23:14

Looked like blue hoops to me

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45902
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Snowflake Royal » 12 Dec 2020 23:19

Too much white.

White shoulders, white shorts, white socks. Might as well be Leeds.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25395
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Dec 2020 23:28

Reading used to have white shorts, white socks and (of course) a lot of white on the shirt...even in the seventies.

Agree tho’...not QPRs best kit


Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10184
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Lefty echochamber scared of free speech

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Millsy » 13 Dec 2020 01:39

bcubed
Millsy
Millsy
Where's the gloating then you clueless tosser? He was taken off.


F**k off Millsy. Why are you replying to yourself anyway? Really immature and it's not funny.


You crack on mate

No problem replying to yourself as far as I am concerned

At least you get a response that way


Hehe well said :lol:

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7382
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Royal Ginger » 13 Dec 2020 08:43

CountryRoyal
Hound Couple of great bits of defending from Gibson on the highlights


Thought Gibson was excellent. A no nonsense left back, positionally very astute. Lacked attacking prowess but I can accept that so long as he’s not a liability defensively.

I get your point and agree to an extent but I struggle to label that performance excellent because he’s only playing half of the position. If we thought Holmes looked a bit overly defensive Gibson made him look like a winger by comparison.

No criticism of the player, he clearly did what he was asked to do and he did that well, but if we’re going to play a style that utilises wing-backs, a defence only approach isn’t asking enough from him.

I get that it was an emergency situation and he was relatively untested but I don’t think he was given enough of a ceiling to tick the excellent box.

I’d go more for ‘did what was asked if him’

User avatar
royalp-we
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2242
Joined: 30 Sep 2010 11:04

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by royalp-we » 13 Dec 2020 08:55

Tbf both Gibson and Ejaria dealt with Kakai, who has given other teams all sorts of problems. I’d go for quality performance.

Notts Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1018
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 00:07

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Notts Royal » 13 Dec 2020 09:33

AthleticoSpizz Reading used to have white shorts, white socks and (of course) a lot of white on the shirt...even in the seventies.

Agree tho’...not QPRs best kit


I prefer ours to theirs on the whole...but do like the fact their hoops go all the way round like hoops are meant to do


South Coast Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6528
Joined: 16 Jan 2020 17:29

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by South Coast Royal » 13 Dec 2020 11:10

I think most of us would have taken a draw both before and during with the line-up that we put out.

Three things:-
Last week I went on again about defenders not closing down attackers in this division as many are capable of scoring from there so our goal and their near miss were scored that way and watching bits on Sky whilst watching our game on i-follow there were a number of goals scored from longish range.

So Reading and others (although I don't care about others) should work and work IMHO during games to block these chances (see also earlier goals scored against us where Raphael has been rightly or wrongly blamed).
We used to be poor at blocking crosses from wide (remember the Welsh bloke we had at right-back for far too long? :wink: ) but that is no longer so much of an issue.

Secondly I said that I would like to see Laurent bring the ball forward from the back rather than staying so deep -I was delighted when he did that more than once yesterday including one brilliant run and there is definitely more to his game than just filling in between the two centre-backs.

Thirdly Baldock.
I liked him at Brighton, especially when he scored a cracking volley at Bournemouth in the season that they went up.
Unfortunately 4 years or so later all that he seems to offer now is running around a lot and so often nearly getting a touch.
At the moment I suppose he just has to play so , as others have said, the other players must appreciate what he can and can't do and try to play to his strengths because we have a number of games before Meite and Joao are back (and Puscas(?)) and we have 5 important games to play before any new signings can play.

With all the top sides winning both home and away yesterday that late great winner kept us in the race but we have to get points out of games coming up and we won't be able to rely on wonder goals and otherwise make no chances in games like yesterday.
It won't work just waiting for our strikers to come back as with games against Norwich, Brentford and Swansea coming up points are vital otherwise we could easily drop well away from the top 6.

Having said all that, to be in contention this season has been unexpected and uplifting, especially with the drabness of restricted life away from football, but to keep it all going we really need back-up players to come to the party and Baldock is an important factor.

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9524
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by NewCorkSeth » 13 Dec 2020 11:17

One note on Gibson, I noticed he drifted centrally a lot more often then one would hope. Richards hugs the line unless he goes on one of his excellent dribbles.

Obviously to too soon to say if that is a problem or even his style but it should be noted as something to watch. Could get himself badly caught out.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11942
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by RoyalBlue » 13 Dec 2020 11:46

NewCorkSeth One note on Gibson, I noticed he drifted centrally a lot more often then one would hope. Richards hugs the line unless he goes on one of his excellent dribbles.

Obviously to too soon to say if that is a problem or even his style but it should be noted as something to watch. Could get himself badly caught out.


Possibly forgetting he's having to play at Left Back rather than as a Central Defender - reverting to type?

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Zip » 13 Dec 2020 11:57

South Coast Royal I think most of us would have taken a draw both before and during with the line-up that we put out.

Three things:-
Last week I went on again about defenders not closing down attackers in this division as many are capable of scoring from there so our goal and their near miss were scored that way and watching bits on Sky whilst watching our game on i-follow there were a number of goals scored from longish range.

So Reading and others (although I don't care about others) should work and work IMHO during games to block these chances (see also earlier goals scored against us where Raphael has been rightly or wrongly blamed).
We used to be poor at blocking crosses from wide (remember the Welsh bloke we had at right-back for far too long? :wink: ) but that is no longer so much of an issue.

Secondly I said that I would like to see Laurent bring the ball forward from the back rather than staying so deep -I was delighted when he did that more than once yesterday including one brilliant run and there is definitely more to his game than just filling in between the two centre-backs.

Thirdly Baldock.
I liked him at Brighton, especially when he scored a cracking volley at Bournemouth in the season that they went up.
Unfortunately 4 years or so later all that he seems to offer now is running around a lot and so often nearly getting a touch.
At the moment I suppose he just has to play so , as others have said, the other players must appreciate what he can and can't do and try to play to his strengths because we have a number of games before Meite and Joao are back (and Puscas(?)) and we have 5 important games to play before any new signings can play.

With all the top sides winning both home and away yesterday that late great winner kept us in the race but we have to get points out of games coming up and we won't be able to rely on wonder goals and otherwise make no chances in games like yesterday.
It won't work just waiting for our strikers to come back as with games against Norwich, Brentford and Swansea coming up points are vital otherwise we could easily drop well away from the top 6.

Having said all that, to be in contention this season has been unexpected and uplifting, especially with the drabness of restricted life away from football, but to keep it all going we really need back-up players to come to the party and Baldock is an important factor.


Yep agree with all of this although it now looks like Joao might be available for Boxing Day which would be a big boost.

Westwood52
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1083
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 16:46

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Westwood52 » 13 Dec 2020 12:05

Royal Ginger
CountryRoyal
Hound Couple of great bits of defending from Gibson on the highlights


Thought Gibson was excellent. A no nonsense left back, positionally very astute. Lacked attacking prowess but I can accept that so long as he’s not a liability defensively.

I get your point and agree to an extent but I struggle to label that performance excellent because he’s only playing half of the position. If we thought Holmes looked a bit overly defensive Gibson made him look like a winger by comparison.

No criticism of the player, he clearly did what he was asked to do and he did that well, but if we’re going to play a style that utilises wing-backs, a defence only approach isn’t asking enough from him.

I get that it was an emergency situation and he was relatively untested but I don’t think he was given enough of a ceiling to tick the excellent box.

I’d go more for ‘did what was asked if him’


Except Holmes made an almighty cock up late 2nd half.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11942
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by RoyalBlue » 13 Dec 2020 12:09

Zip
South Coast Royal I think most of us would have taken a draw both before and during with the line-up that we put out.

Three things:-
Last week I went on again about defenders not closing down attackers in this division as many are capable of scoring from there so our goal and their near miss were scored that way and watching bits on Sky whilst watching our game on i-follow there were a number of goals scored from longish range.

So Reading and others (although I don't care about others) should work and work IMHO during games to block these chances (see also earlier goals scored against us where Raphael has been rightly or wrongly blamed).
We used to be poor at blocking crosses from wide (remember the Welsh bloke we had at right-back for far too long? :wink: ) but that is no longer so much of an issue.

Secondly I said that I would like to see Laurent bring the ball forward from the back rather than staying so deep -I was delighted when he did that more than once yesterday including one brilliant run and there is definitely more to his game than just filling in between the two centre-backs.

Thirdly Baldock.
I liked him at Brighton, especially when he scored a cracking volley at Bournemouth in the season that they went up.
Unfortunately 4 years or so later all that he seems to offer now is running around a lot and so often nearly getting a touch.
At the moment I suppose he just has to play so , as others have said, the other players must appreciate what he can and can't do and try to play to his strengths because we have a number of games before Meite and Joao are back (and Puscas(?)) and we have 5 important games to play before any new signings can play.

With all the top sides winning both home and away yesterday that late great winner kept us in the race but we have to get points out of games coming up and we won't be able to rely on wonder goals and otherwise make no chances in games like yesterday.
It won't work just waiting for our strikers to come back as with games against Norwich, Brentford and Swansea coming up points are vital otherwise we could easily drop well away from the top 6.

Having said all that, to be in contention this season has been unexpected and uplifting, especially with the drabness of restricted life away from football, but to keep it all going we really need back-up players to come to the party and Baldock is an important factor.


Yep agree with all of this although it now looks like Joao might be available for Boxing Day which would be a big boost.


Dellor doesn't bother to listen when he does his interviews with VP. Sadly VP said that he thought Joao would be out 'until the end of this year'.

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18958
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: MATCHWATCH : Queens Park Rangers (a) sponsored by Jones 2, Tait

by Pepe the Horseman » 13 Dec 2020 12:34

I wanna see McIntyre start up front on Wednesday.

201 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests

It is currently 29 Jun 2025 00:13