Royal Rother It obviously wasn't about the money otherwise he'd have gone.
Bizarre comment.
by leon » 29 Nov 2015 22:43
Royal Rother It obviously wasn't about the money otherwise he'd have gone.
by CountryRoyal » 29 Nov 2015 23:09
Royal Rother It obviously wasn't about the money otherwise he'd have gone.
by Royal Rother » 29 Nov 2015 23:27
by CountryRoyal » 29 Nov 2015 23:38
Royal Rother He was offered more money at Fulham.
He decided to stay at Reading therefore it wasn't about the money.
What's difficult to understand about that?
by RoyalBlue » 30 Nov 2015 07:49
by Barcelona Blue » 30 Nov 2015 09:02
by paultheroyal » 30 Nov 2015 10:15
by Ian Royal » 01 Dec 2015 11:50
by multisync1830 » 01 Dec 2015 11:56
Ian Royal Fail to beat QPR and i reckon he's out the next time he fails to win, with the danger switch resetting to min 5 points from the next three games every time he manages to get a couple of wins on the bounce.
by One8Seven1* » 01 Dec 2015 12:02
Royal Rother He was offered more money at Fulham.
He decided to stay at Reading therefore it wasn't about the money.
What's difficult to understand about that?
by genome » 01 Dec 2015 12:25
by CountryRoyal » 01 Dec 2015 12:35
genome I think the real question is, there's been an typo in the thread title for 20 pages now and it's still not corrected.
I can't be the only one that's bugging.
by floyd__streete » 01 Dec 2015 12:36
by CountryRoyal » 01 Dec 2015 12:41
floyd__streete Neil Warnock might be surprised on Thursday at not being the most unpopular man in the dug outs at Madejski Stadium for once
by genome » 01 Dec 2015 12:51
CountryRoyalgenome I think the real question is, there's been an typo in the thread title for 20 pages now and it's still not corrected.
I can't be the only one that's bugging.
I noticed my error after page 5, but I couldn't really be bothered to change it. I think it adds charecter to the thread.
by Sutekh » 01 Dec 2015 12:52
genomeCountryRoyalgenome I think the real question is, there's been an typo in the thread title for 20 pages now and it's still not corrected.
I can't be the only one that's bugging.
I noticed my error after page 5, but I couldn't really be bothered to change it. I think it adds charecter to the thread.
Are to sure about that?
by genome » 01 Dec 2015 12:54
by Extended-Phenotype » 01 Dec 2015 12:57
by CountryRoyal » 01 Dec 2015 13:03
genome The possibility of C3PO successfully backing Steve Clarke is approximately 3,720 to 1.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests