Confimred new owners of Raeding Footbal Club

8685 posts
Norfolk Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3557
Joined: 30 Apr 2004 16:07
Location: Carrot juice is the elixir of the Gods.

Re: Buyout

by Norfolk Royal » 06 Jun 2014 16:08

Sort of throws new light on it in a bucket of sh*t sort of way I suppose.

Bit of an anti-climax to know this is a workaday balls-up by people you would expect more of rather than a grand conspiracy.

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Buyout

by Nameless » 06 Jun 2014 16:09

Terminal Boardom
Schards#2 "Handing over power to the lender" is extremely disconcerting. With SJM dealing with things you know there is someone in there with the clubs best wishes at heart. With a bank, who knows.


So, those that loaned the money have the say on who takes over the ownership. Since when does a bank give a oxf*rd as long as they get their money back? They could, effectively, sell the club to anyone. Selling to an Investment Group does not make me want to run naked through Forbury Gardens in celebration.


Perhaps a condition of the loan was tht the lender had a say in the sale process. It's not uncommon for loans to come with strings attached.....

User avatar
72 bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2326
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 11:01

Re: Buyout

by 72 bus » 06 Jun 2014 16:11

RoyalBlue So, as many suspected, despite having left the board, it looks very much like Samuelson is still heavily involved in the sale.

Yet still the gullible hang onto and swallow every word that they are fed by club & chairman without opening their eyes and questioning what the sub text might be.


However, after receiving several firm offers, he said the club's lenders, who were now brokering a deal for Reading, were close to finalising terms.
"Sir John (Madejski - Reading chairman) has handed power over the lender," added Samuelson.

You really are a thick cunt if you think Samuelson is still involved, he can now speak freely because he is out of it with no dog in the fight anymore

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7382
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Buyout

by Royal Ginger » 06 Jun 2014 16:45

Nameless
Terminal Boardom
Schards#2 "Handing over power to the lender" is extremely disconcerting. With SJM dealing with things you know there is someone in there with the clubs best wishes at heart. With a bank, who knows.


So, those that loaned the money have the say on who takes over the ownership. Since when does a bank give a oxf*rd as long as they get their money back? They could, effectively, sell the club to anyone. Selling to an Investment Group does not make me want to run naked through Forbury Gardens in celebration.


Perhaps a condition of the loan was tht the lender had a say in the sale process. It's not uncommon for loans to come with strings attached.....


The loaner likely assumed control of the club as a penalty for defaulting on repayments. Much like a bodged mortgage.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Buyout

by ZacNaloen » 06 Jun 2014 16:50

That basically means we are in administration


User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 32120
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: Buyout

by leon » 06 Jun 2014 17:03

I hope so. The sooner we can close down the team board, the better

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Buyout

by Extended-Phenotype » 06 Jun 2014 17:04

Wait, if we are in administration does that mean a points penalty?

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18958
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Buyout

by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Jun 2014 17:06

I'm so confused/tired/hungry.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Buyout

by Extended-Phenotype » 06 Jun 2014 17:07

Pepe the Horseman I'm so confused/tired/hungry/gayforEP


User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18958
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Buyout

by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Jun 2014 17:09

Get out of my head.

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Buyout

by Nameless » 06 Jun 2014 17:10

Royal Ginger
Nameless


Perhaps a condition of the loan was tht the lender had a say in the sale process. It's not uncommon for loans to come with strings attached.....


The loaner likely assumed control of the club as a penalty for defaulting on repayments. Much like a bodged mortgage.


I suspect it's more to do with the tax issue. SJM said funding was in place to cover that and perhaps that was done on condition that the lender managed the sale. Couple of thoughts
1. Is the lender definitely a bank ?
2. Could the lender actually be Samuelson ?
If he covered the tax and was given control over the sale (and probably a fee) in return for leaving the board and toning down his 2 year consultancy demand would that not make sense ?

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Buyout

by Extended-Phenotype » 06 Jun 2014 17:12

Pepe the Horseman Get out of my head.


And in to my car

User avatar
TheLawnMowerMan
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 546
Joined: 29 May 2005 23:28
Location: In my computer

Re: Buyout

by TheLawnMowerMan » 06 Jun 2014 17:18

ZacNaloen That basically means we are in administration

No it doesn't - this is different.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Buyout

by Ian Royal » 06 Jun 2014 17:35

TBM If we got £90m when promoted - how are we now £20m in debt....... :shock:

loyalroyaldaz Where's Ian Royal ?
I was busy working for a living. I thought someone as unashamedly ITK as you would be able to answer.

To answer TBM:
Because we didn't. It's an oft misleadingly quoted figure. Getting promoted to the PL was worth £90m, but in income over FIVE seasons. We didn't get it all (yet).
2012-13: ~£50m PL TV (etc) income (note this is not £50m more than we got in the Championship)
2013-14: ~£16m parachute payment
2014-15: ~£12m parachute payment
2015-16: ~ £8m parachute payment
2016-17: ~ £4m parachute payment

Or something vaguely similar.

Please remember we made a loss of about £12m the previous season.

So in actual fact, last season we got something like £59m income total. Check the accounts, they're on club policies somewhere. We spent ~£46m on wages alone and made a total loss of ~£2m after other expenditure.

This is all easily available information if you want to find it out. It's even all on here. It's not like I'm ITK or have special access to anything.

User avatar
blueroyals
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2205
Joined: 02 Sep 2010 02:11

Re: Buyout

by blueroyals » 06 Jun 2014 17:41

WE DEFAULTED ON OUR LOANS AND GAVE CONTROL TO A "LENDER"

NOT A BANK

A "LENDER"

who will sell to the highest bidder

we're so f*cked

loyalroyaldaz
Member
Posts: 755
Joined: 29 Aug 2009 09:57

Re: Buyout

by loyalroyaldaz » 06 Jun 2014 17:41

Cant be arsed to work. On the beach in Majorca reading this and although im not happy at what im reading it seems the info i was given may be somewhere near the mark.
Could be old JM's words the other day were his parting gift to us.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22544
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: Buyout

by Sutekh » 06 Jun 2014 17:42

So when we went up we had no money, thus we could only afford to look at Championship level players for the most part.

The little bit of money that was available to strengthen went on Guthrie and Pogrebnyak's wages.

AZ seems to have used everything he had to complete the first part of the deal and then not been able to attract sufficient backing from elsewhere to be able to support the club in the PL nor to complete the remainder of the deal and so we basically were unable to compete at all in the PL.

Last season they obviously thought they were going to have money available and so we had the promising start with acquiring Bridge, Williams and Drenthe but then something happened and AZ obviously conceded he was not going to be able to complete so that was it - no money and every possible loan and way of getting money into the club taken up giving an alarming debt (though nothing really on the lines of many of the basket cases masquerading of football clubs in the PL and FL).

So just perhaps it's all just an unfortunate set of circumstances that have brought us here. If JM had not sold to AZ then I think we'd still be in similar position in looking for a buyer and having to sell players. On the bright side the brief sojourn to the PL and the involvement of CS and AZ at least increased our profile to be able to attract more interest.

Let's hope early next week it's all sorted and the new owners revealed so we can finally establish where we are and what budget NA has to play with (if any) next season.

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Buyout

by sandman » 06 Jun 2014 17:46

72 bus
RoyalBlue So, as many suspected, despite having left the board, it looks very much like Samuelson is still heavily involved in the sale.

Yet still the gullible hang onto and swallow every word that they are fed by club & chairman without opening their eyes and questioning what the sub text might be.


However, after receiving several firm offers, he said the club's lenders, who were now brokering a deal for Reading, were close to finalising terms.
"Sir John (Madejski - Reading chairman) has handed power over the lender," added Samuelson.

You really are a thick cunt if you think Samuelson is still involved, he can now speak freely because he is out of it with no dog in the fight anymore


How dare you speak to him like that! Don't you know his daughter is a goalkeeper?

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Buyout

by ZacNaloen » 06 Jun 2014 18:08

TheLawnMowerMan
ZacNaloen That basically means we are in administration

No it doesn't - this is different.




I know, i know, but its just so easy to say stuff.

The sale is being controlled/administered by a 3rd party. This isnt that unusual. Its nothing to be with being insolvent. And it certainly doesn't mean we've defaulted on any debts either.

User avatar
Green
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 29481
Joined: 29 Jun 2012 13:28

Re: Buyout

by Green » 06 Jun 2014 18:15

'greed.

8685 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Byron_Glasgow and 140 guests

It is currently 29 Jun 2025 11:50