by Hoop Blah »
14 Oct 2011 13:25
1) Capello will take him.
2) He is a very very good player and would certainly challenge for a place in the Spain team. His technique, awareness, workrate and vision are exactly the kind of thing that Spain and Barca look for and work off. I really can't understand people who can't appreciate how good a player he is (the number of goals he's scored or his performances at the last World Cup don't change that), it's like you can't appreciate how good he is for the want of being critical.
3) I'd take him. The argument that the other strikers would just be looking over their shoulder doesn't hold water for me. Competition for places is always a good thing and if they can't handle a good player breathing over their shoulder for their spot then they shouldn't be playing football at that level.
The argument that we might become a better team without him is potentially valid and it is certainly a possibility (France improved when they ditched Cantona and Ginola at different times didn't they?), however, you'd still take him because having a player of his ability to come off the bench or into the team is something that managers can usually only dream of.
Can we waste a place in the 23 man squad? Of course we can. Depending on tactics I've always maintained we should take 5 forwards and lose a specialist full back or centre half (we have the likes of Richards, Lescot, Smalling, Jones etc) who can double up to offer good quality cover across the back and it's having the options and quality in the final third that generally gets you through the knockout games. There's plenty of scope to fit Rooney into the 23, even if that means we come home before he gets to play.
4) The alternatives: Crouch doesn't seem fancied these days, which I think is a shame, and I see Gerrard being the obvious direct replacement in a 4-2-3-1 which it looks like we'll go into the Euro's playing. With that in mind the likes of Bent, Sturridge, Zamora, Carroll (for that something different) and Welbeck can all provide a decent point to the attack but none of them will be the real replacement for Rooney because one of them will play regardless, it's who take's the number 10 position that is the interesting question. Young may well be the other likely alternative to Gerrard with Lennon, Adam Jonhson, Milner, Downing, Oxlade-Chamberlain (perhaps if he has a big season) or even SWP making a late taking the other wide berth. The attacking 3 should really be flexible and adaptable enough to switch around and vary the attack enough that Rooney as an individual isn't the be all and end all so we do have the depth.
The only reasona I wouldn't take him is if, as the manager who knew him, I thought he wouldn't cope with the pressure of not playing for 3 games or, and probably much more likely, that the distraction of having him around (largely in the eyes of the media) would have too much of a negative on the preperations as it has in the past with other key players.