Snowball
Yes, but it was rather helped by being our only penalty taker
and taking all the free-kicks, too...
The old should-be-put-down Ian H would now be on 12/13 if he'd taken all our pens (+ 2 for Carlisle)
Ian Royal good penalty taker gets more goals shocker.
Doyle didn't tend to take that many penalties in his high scoring seasons for us did he? Presumably that makes him the best scorer.
Still think Kitson is the daddy for his allround play and superbly consistent scoring record. Bar the season he was injured for most of it which is understandable.
WimbSnowball
Yes, but it was rather helped by being our only penalty taker
and taking all the free-kicks, too...
The old should-be-put-down Ian H would now be on 12/13 if he'd taken all our pens (+ 2 for Carlisle)
And Long would be on about 12 if you took away the pens would he not
Ian Royal good penalty taker gets more goals shocker.
Doyle didn't tend to take that many penalties in his high scoring seasons for us did he? Presumably that makes him the best scorer.
SnowballIan Royal good penalty taker gets more goals shocker.
Doyle didn't tend to take that many penalties in his high scoring seasons for us did he? Presumably that makes him the best scorer.
Doesn't that depend on what happens in the next 12+ games?
Currently Long is on 19, Doyle's best was 18. Long might finish on 25+ yet!
Jeffers217Ian Royal good penalty taker gets more goals shocker.
Doyle didn't tend to take that many penalties in his high scoring seasons for us did he? Presumably that makes him the best scorer.
Still think Kitson is the daddy for his allround play and superbly consistent scoring record. Bar the season he was injured for most of it which is understandable.
By far at this level Kitson wins for his all-round play. Consistently over a few seasons too. Long will have to keep this up for the next 2 seasons if he's to be on the same level
SnowballWimbSnowball
Yes, but it was rather helped by being our only penalty taker
and taking all the free-kicks, too...
The old should-be-put-down Ian H would now be on 12/13 if he'd taken all our pens (+ 2 for Carlisle)
And Long would be on about 12 if you took away the pens would he not
19-5 is?
Ian Royal Shorey had the fk skill as well.
KC Royal The point still stands though! He actually said what i had in mind myself. You can't knock Sig's goal tally for including pens and ignore it for Long, it works both ways! And personally i think scoring free-kicks is an art, an art that only Sigurdsson, Harte and Caskey have managed in my time as a fan. Its not like Sigurdsson scored free-kicks every time he took them either, though im willing to be proved wrong on that.
Hoop Blah I think that's all in your head Snowball.
I'm pretty sure most of the people who point out Longs penalty contribution also do the same with Sigurdssons. What you're probably doing confusing one person posting on the forum with a whole host of others! It's a consideration though IF you want to quantify a players ability through the number of goals they score.
T.R.O.L.I. Just out of interest (as I can't be arsed to trawl back through the thread):
1. Why only go back to 2002/03?
2. What "weighting" have you given to the sub appearances? 15 mins? 20 mins?
SnowballT.R.O.L.I. Just out of interest (as I can't be arsed to trawl back through the thread):
1. Why only go back to 2002/03?
.
Because I can get the figures off the OS. They don't go back further2. What "weighting" have you given to the sub appearances? 15 mins? 20 mins?
When guesstimating minutes I've presumed starts as 90 minutes
and sub appearances as 15 minutes average
Ian Royal Thought Caskey was 22 TROLI, could easily be wrong though.
Curo got about 36 around 2002.. Butler 20+?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Keysfield and 258 guests
