by Dirk Gently » 29 Apr 2010 13:40
by Row Z Royal » 29 Apr 2010 13:44
by SpaceCruiser » 29 Apr 2010 14:00
by Stranded » 29 Apr 2010 14:10
by LoyalRoyalFan » 29 Apr 2010 14:11
by Silver Fox » 29 Apr 2010 14:12
by Stranded » 29 Apr 2010 14:13
LoyalRoyalFan World Cup's should be held in strong footballing nations.
Not Qatar.
by Messiah » 29 Apr 2010 14:13
LoyalRoyalFan World Cup's should be held in strong footballing nations.
Not Qatar.
by 26-10-06 » 29 Apr 2010 14:14
StrandedLoyalRoyalFan World Cup's should be held in strong footballing nations.
Not Qatar.
With all due respect you are speaking out of your ar$e.
by Stranded » 29 Apr 2010 14:16
by LoyalRoyalFan » 29 Apr 2010 14:16
by Silver Fox » 29 Apr 2010 14:21
by papereyes » 29 Apr 2010 14:21
by SpaceCruiser » 29 Apr 2010 14:23
by Jerry St Clair » 29 Apr 2010 14:23
Stranded If they can do it, then why not.
by 26-10-06 » 29 Apr 2010 14:24
Stranded So you'd just have a closed shop of half a dozen European countries and the few South American ones who can afford to host it?
Not much of a "World" Cup then is it?
by TBM » 29 Apr 2010 14:25
LoyalRoyalFan What have Qatar done to enhance the game?
by Silver Fox » 29 Apr 2010 14:25
SpaceCruiser My reason for saying no thanks is that it's probably too hot in the summer for players to be playing in. I might be wrong though.
by Stranded » 29 Apr 2010 14:25
SpaceCruiser My reason for saying no thanks is that it's probably too hot in the summer for players to be playing in. I might be wrong though.
by Stranded » 29 Apr 2010 14:26
Jerry St ClairStranded If they can do it, then why not.
Because it's ecological insanity?
Users browsing this forum: Royalcop and 43 guests