Hoop Blah Coppell's last 18 months were appalling.
Not true, there was a very good 4 month spell running up to around Christmas last season.
by Wycombe Royal » 24 Sep 2009 11:35
Hoop Blah Coppell's last 18 months were appalling.
by Hoop Blah » 24 Sep 2009 11:47
Wycombe RoyalHoop Blah Coppell's last 18 months were appalling.
Not true, there was a very good 4 month spell running up to around Christmas last season.
by adamh4608 » 24 Sep 2009 12:18
by Hoop Blah » 24 Sep 2009 12:27
adamh4608 my be coppell hands were tied as sir john did not want to invest as we can all see now
by Scarface » 24 Sep 2009 12:29
by adamh4608 » 24 Sep 2009 12:38
Scarface He should be given the season, however if we're rock bottom at Xmas I reckon he'll be sacked and Murty will be back.
by winchester_royal » 24 Sep 2009 12:40
Stranded Can I just ask what did people actually expect given the complete overhaul this summer - where did you realistically expect us to be now?
It's not great at the mo, and could get worse but easily we could be one win away from a decent run.
Unless and it's a big unless we start to get cut off in the bottom three then Rodgers gets the season (and probably til Xmas next season) at the very least. Changing so quickly would do more harm that good. Look at Charlton, Curbishley left and they went through about 3 managers in a year as the fans/club did not have the patience to allow things to gel.
by Forbury Lion » 24 Sep 2009 12:58
by Vision » 24 Sep 2009 13:19
winchester_royal We have some very talented footballers in our group,
by Alan Partridge » 24 Sep 2009 13:19
winchester_royalStranded Can I just ask what did people actually expect given the complete overhaul this summer - where did you realistically expect us to be now?
It's not great at the mo, and could get worse but easily we could be one win away from a decent run.
Unless and it's a big unless we start to get cut off in the bottom three then Rodgers gets the season (and probably til Xmas next season) at the very least. Changing so quickly would do more harm that good. Look at Charlton, Curbishley left and they went through about 3 managers in a year as the fans/club did not have the patience to allow things to gel.
That's just it, and the comedy of it all is that the same people who were warning us it would take time when Rodgers took over are those calling for his head now.
We are playing decent, attacking football. We have some very talented footballers in our group, and a couple of the youngsters are really making their mark. That was all I expected to have happenned by now.
It is no suprise that most of the clubs up there at the moment are those who have a solid core who have been with each other for a while, while those squads who have had a complete overhaul (Nottm Forest, Ipswich, QPR..etc) are struggling.
The results are, IMO, quite clearly within reach, and with a bit more luck we could have been in and around the play-offs ATM. But we're not, and the players have to close out a result sooner or later. However to even consider sacking Rodgers is utter bull, and most fans understand that.
by wolsey » 24 Sep 2009 13:21
by SteveRoyal » 24 Sep 2009 13:22
by Ian Royal » 24 Sep 2009 13:50
by Vision » 24 Sep 2009 15:01
Ian Royal I expected us to be turning up to games and putting in a decent hard working performance every game. I expected us try and win every game, even if it was by defending for most of it and trying to sneak a win on the break. I expected Rodgers to show a clear plan on what he was doing. I expected to spend the first 10 - 20 games averaging about 1 pt per game or higher.
We are not getting this. We are getting decent hardworking performances in bursts, but not all game. We have not tried to win every game. We turned up for the crucial opening game and used it as a training excercise, assuming that position was converted to goals at the end of the match.
Rodgers has chopped and changed every game and doesn't know his best team. He doesn't know his best formation. At least I hope he doesn't because the one he's playing at the moment is likely to see us relegated without a big change. (3 games, 3 loses, 3 for, 7 against)
I know we're only a couple of points off where I'm saying we should be above, but look at our next few games. The realistic chances of picking up good points there are slim.
Look back at the games we've had and you can see we should have picked up more against Forest, Swansea, Peterborough and Cardiff at least, arguably Sheff U could be added to that. I'm not saying you will always pick up points when you should or that we should expect that. But in 4 of our 8 games we should and could have got a better result without a great deal of difficulty. That would double our points, not even considering we should actually have beaten not drawn against P'boro and maybe even Cardiff rather than losing.
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 24 Sep 2009 15:09
by Hoop Blah » 24 Sep 2009 15:37
VisionIan Royal Look back at the games we've had and you can see we should have picked up more against Forest, Swansea, Peterborough and Cardiff at least, arguably Sheff U could be added to that. I'm not saying you will always pick up points when you should or that we should expect that. But in 4 of our 8 games we should and could have got a better result without a great deal of difficulty. That would double our points, not even considering we should actually have beaten not drawn against P'boro and maybe even Cardiff rather than losing.
When you say we should have done better than we did in those games , are you talking about "on paper" or how we actually played in the games? If its the latter then surely it suggests the performances were better than the results we got.
by winchester_royal » 24 Sep 2009 16:24
Visionwinchester_royal We have some very talented footballers in our group,
You are Brendan Rodgers AICMFP.
by Ian Royal » 24 Sep 2009 17:25
VisionIan Royal
Look back at the games we've had and you can see we should have picked up more against Forest, Swansea, Peterborough and Cardiff at least, arguably Sheff U could be added to that. I'm not saying you will always pick up points when you should or that we should expect that. But in 4 of our 8 games we should and could have got a better result without a great deal of difficulty. That would double our points, not even considering we should actually have beaten not drawn against P'boro and maybe even Cardiff rather than losing.
When you say we should have done better than we did in those games , are you talking about "on paper" or how we actually played in the games? If its the latter then surely it suggests the performances were better than the results we got.
by PremAddict » 24 Sep 2009 17:32
by mzungu_royal » 24 Sep 2009 17:37
Ian RoyalVisionIan Royal
Look back at the games we've had and you can see we should have picked up more against Forest, Swansea, Peterborough and Cardiff at least, arguably Sheff U could be added to that. I'm not saying you will always pick up points when you should or that we should expect that. But in 4 of our 8 games we should and could have got a better result without a great deal of difficulty. That would double our points, not even considering we should actually have beaten not drawn against P'boro and maybe even Cardiff rather than losing.
When you say we should have done better than we did in those games , are you talking about "on paper" or how we actually played in the games? If its the latter then surely it suggests the performances were better than the results we got.
Neither of those are quite what I mean over all 4/5 games.
Forest:- Passed them off the pitch and restricted them to very few decent chances. It's hard to score from inside your own half though. Which is where we were far too happy to spend most of our time on the ball.
Swansea:- This one is more on paper. They've scored 3 goals this season ffs. I didn't see the game, but it certainly sounded (from reports on here and the radio) that we were poor against a pretty mediocre team.
Peterborough:- This one is obvious. 2-0 up at half time against a team yet to win, having been the better team. We threw it away completely. Yet the result was thoroughly deserved based on the performance.
Cardiff:- Again, wasn't there but from here and the radio commentary we sounded the team more in control and should have scored several. Instead we let them catch us out against the run of play. I'm not sure you could say we deserved to win, or draw, but we shouldn't have lost.
Sheffield Utd:- Not there again, but the accounts sound like we were very good in the first half but let them back into it once they sussed our rather one dimensional system and had no counter to their play.Although give the comparative form it's hard to argue that we should have got something out of this one.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Royals and Racers, Snowflake Royal and 322 guests