by roberto_11 » 02 Sep 2009 17:19
by Ian Royal » 02 Sep 2009 17:21
by The Quiet Man » 02 Sep 2009 19:13
by Royalee » 02 Sep 2009 19:27
MalcybabyRFC I can’t wait for the international break to be over.
I am totally behind Rodgers and his plans to shape Reading into a young, dynamic squad, building good relationships with the top SPL & Premier league clubs for loan & buying purposes just like our competitors have done and where we have failed in the past.
Rodgers has spent most of his career to date working and developing youth players for both us and Chelsea. I can fully understand his ideas and I am just thankful we have a manager who knows something about young talent, where to look for it and finally how to get the best from them!!!!
I’m sad to see the back of SSC promotion boys and I was scared that we were loosing our identity that we had worked hard to achieve. I may temporarily miss the period where if I mention Reading FC to my mates, automatically they come up with the names of Doyle, Hunt, Lita, Bikey, and obviously Coppel but I also appreciate this has now happened and look forward to the new era under what could be the greatest ever manager Reading FC has ever seen.
Im a loyal royal and although these past couple of months have been a roller coaster im excited about what’s to come.
COME ON URZZZZZZZ
by Royalee » 02 Sep 2009 19:30
ZacNaloen When are some of you going to realise that when the club talk about their aspirations, i'e get back in the premier league, be a stable premiership club, be as big as arsenal etc these are goals for the long term and they will take as long as they take. Have some patience and just enjoy the bloody football will you. I'll take the long game over the short game any day. Far more interesting.
by Millsy » 02 Sep 2009 19:42
RoyaleeZacNaloen When are some of you going to realise that when the club talk about their aspirations, i'e get back in the premier league, be a stable premiership club, be as big as arsenal etc these are goals for the long term and they will take as long as they take. Have some patience and just enjoy the bloody football will you. I'll take the long game over the short game any day. Far more interesting.
Spot on.
by FiNeRaIn » 02 Sep 2009 19:42
RoyaleeZacNaloen When are some of you going to realise that when the club talk about their aspirations, i'e get back in the premier league, be a stable premiership club, be as big as arsenal etc these are goals for the long term and they will take as long as they take. Have some patience and just enjoy the bloody football will you. I'll take the long game over the short game any day. Far more interesting.
Spot on.
by ZacNaloen » 02 Sep 2009 20:03
by Royalee » 02 Sep 2009 20:13
FiNeRaInRoyaleeZacNaloen When are some of you going to realise that when the club talk about their aspirations, i'e get back in the premier league, be a stable premiership club, be as big as arsenal etc these are goals for the long term and they will take as long as they take. Have some patience and just enjoy the bloody football will you. I'll take the long game over the short game any day. Far more interesting.
Spot on.
Not really- we spent years building to get to the prem...brick by brick.. a gradual well run process. Surely the long term plan was to stay there...not fvck it all up and start form square one again? If so, this isn't effective in business or football terms.
by Terminal Boardom » 02 Sep 2009 20:19
Royalee Rodgers and the youngsters represent the brick by brick aspect of the approach, plus the average age of the players we are bringing in.
by M Brook » 02 Sep 2009 20:27
fester_royaldonface So wot
well never win anything wiv a team of chelski rejects and playas who cudn't even make it into championship teams. Wheres da money gon? we cant be that bad off if we canlet our to best palyas go for nuthing.
ROGERS OUT
MADJESKI OUT
HAMMOND OUT
can someone please translate this for me? call me old fashioned but I recognise the letters just not the words they've created??
by ZacNaloen » 02 Sep 2009 20:29
Terminal BoardomRoyalee Rodgers and the youngsters represent the brick by brick aspect of the approach, plus the average age of the players we are bringing in.
A brick by brick approach would introduce 1 or 2 youngsters at a time. This is a brickworks in comparison. 3 years is the minimumthat it will take because of the lack of experience and cohesion. How many players do we have on our books with over 100 appearances for Reading? Ivar? Bryn? Admittedly Rasiak, McAnuff and Howard bring experience with them but they still have to bed in WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A PRE SEASON.
by FiNeRaIn » 02 Sep 2009 20:34
by Royalee » 02 Sep 2009 20:35
Terminal BoardomRoyalee Rodgers and the youngsters represent the brick by brick aspect of the approach, plus the average age of the players we are bringing in.
A brick by brick approach would introduce 1 or 2 youngsters at a time. This is a brickworks in comparison. 3 years is the minimumthat it will take because of the lack of experience and cohesion. How many players do we have on our books with over 100 appearances for Reading? Ivar? Bryn? Admittedly Rasiak, McAnuff and Howard bring experience with them but they still have to bed in WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A PRE SEASON.
by ZacNaloen » 02 Sep 2009 20:39
by Terminal Boardom » 02 Sep 2009 20:44
ZacNaloenTerminal BoardomRoyalee Rodgers and the youngsters represent the brick by brick aspect of the approach, plus the average age of the players we are bringing in.
A brick by brick approach would introduce 1 or 2 youngsters at a time. This is a brickworks in comparison. 3 years is the minimumthat it will take because of the lack of experience and cohesion. How many players do we have on our books with over 100 appearances for Reading? Ivar? Bryn? Admittedly Rasiak, McAnuff and Howard bring experience with them but they still have to bed in WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A PRE SEASON.
You aren't getting it are you?
If we'd have tried to do that we'd have bankrupted the club.
This summer was about readjusting the wage structure down, A LOT, to make the next few years affordable and starting from an affordable position.
by Yellowcoat » 02 Sep 2009 20:51
by ZacNaloen » 02 Sep 2009 20:58
I suggest Zac that you read Royalee's comments THEN read mine. I am commenting on a brick by brick approach. What's your definition of a brick by brick approach then? And don't give me this guff about bankrupting the club. Do you know the inside financial workings and mechanics of Reading FC let alone SJM Enterprises? Nether do I which is why I am looking forward to being blinded with bullshit when the club tries to explain where the money has gone.
You know what? I accept what is going on because there is Feck all I can do about it. I don't have a spare 20 billion burning a hole in my back pocket. But I will moan about it because I can!
by Terminal Boardom » 02 Sep 2009 21:01
RoyaleeTerminal BoardomRoyalee Rodgers and the youngsters represent the brick by brick aspect of the approach, plus the average age of the players we are bringing in.
A brick by brick approach would introduce 1 or 2 youngsters at a time. This is a brickworks in comparison. 3 years is the minimumthat it will take because of the lack of experience and cohesion. How many players do we have on our books with over 100 appearances for Reading? Ivar? Bryn? Admittedly Rasiak, McAnuff and Howard bring experience with them but they still have to bed in WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A PRE SEASON.
Rodgers has worked with every player he has signed before aside from Mills who has already settled and O'Dea so I'm not convinced your lack of cohesion argument stands up.
Teams with loads of players with hundreds of games on the books of the club are usually those which stand still or go backwards. Take a look at all the players we signed without your glorious experience when we last went up.
by winchester_royal » 02 Sep 2009 21:06
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 172 guests