New signings

1201 posts
Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3743
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: New signings

by Royalwaster » 02 Sep 2009 12:34

Ideal
Whore Jackie
Big Foot READING have continued their mission of investing in players from Yorkshire clubs with the signing of ex-Barnsley Forward Jan Åge Fjørtoft.


Strong rumours of Ian Ormondroyd joining too.


Jostein Flo might be on his way.


Just saw Robbie Fowler in the car park!

User avatar
(.)Boobies(.)
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: 13 Feb 2009 21:08
Location: North London

Re: New signings

by (.)Boobies(.) » 02 Sep 2009 12:35

Big Foot
Barney So let me just check what has happened so far.

We got relegated from the Prem, and then choked the playoffs. So a lot of folks on
here called for Coppell to go. In amongst this time, a bucket load of players got
slaughtered (Murty, Hannaman, Duberry, Lita, Rosenior, Shunt, Harper to name a few).

So the club brought a young-ish manager in, and are trying something different. A lot of
the 'old guard' have gone, and hand on heart has Harper REALLY played that well recently ?
Are we REALLY going to miss Rosenior ?
Rightly or wrongly, Rodgers and the board are trying something different. Mills, Cummins, O'Dea
will be busting a gut to do well here. And for the first time in a while, we are seeing players come
through from the Academy. Will it work ? Who knows. I for one think it is a breath of fresh air, and whilst
I appreciate what Harper, USA, Doyle, Murty etc etc did for Reading FC it is time to move on.
This is part of what following your club is about. Good luck to you Rodgers. Let's start a new chapter,

Happy to see the back of those senior players you mentioned. What concerns me is why we loaned out Harper and Rosenior to our rivals instead of trying to get a permanent £? Especially as both are out of contract next Summer


Harper has a 60% sell on clause? His wages are not much less than 20k a week. We save about £800k by loaning him out, or we could sell for what was said to be about £1.8m - 60%. Together the football club have saved £3m by letting these two go. That's what it comes down to.

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3743
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: New signings

by Royalwaster » 02 Sep 2009 12:39

Harper has a 60% sell on clause? His wages are not much less than 20k a week. We save about £800k by loaning him out, or we could sell for what was said to be about £1.8m - 60%. Together the football club have saved £3m by letting these two go. That's what it comes down to.[/quote]

I'd say worth pasting your message into every thread - as it is pretty much the only one that makes sense.

User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

Re: New signings

by TFF » 02 Sep 2009 12:40

Big Foot
Barney So let me just check what has happened so far.

We got relegated from the Prem, and then choked the playoffs. So a lot of folks on
here called for Coppell to go. In amongst this time, a bucket load of players got
slaughtered (Murty, Hannaman, Duberry, Lita, Rosenior, Shunt, Harper to name a few).

So the club brought a young-ish manager in, and are trying something different. A lot of
the 'old guard' have gone, and hand on heart has Harper REALLY played that well recently ?
Are we REALLY going to miss Rosenior ?
Rightly or wrongly, Rodgers and the board are trying something different. Mills, Cummins, O'Dea
will be busting a gut to do well here. And for the first time in a while, we are seeing players come
through from the Academy. Will it work ? Who knows. I for one think it is a breath of fresh air, and whilst
I appreciate what Harper, USA, Doyle, Murty etc etc did for Reading FC it is time to move on.
This is part of what following your club is about. Good luck to you Rodgers. Let's start a new chapter,

Happy to see the back of those senior players you mentioned. What concerns me is why we loaned out Harper and Rosenior to our rivals instead of trying to get a permanent £? Especially as both are out of contract next Summer


I would imagine the 40% sell on clause we'd owe Arsenal made just getting him off the wage roll a more attractive proposition. Rosenior's a bit of an odd one, but if BR plans to play Cummings I can't imagine Liam sitting quietly in the ressies. Prob best out so as not to rock the boat.

Certainly brave of Brendan to make the team his own so quickly. He's got nowhere to hide if things don't work out.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11969
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: New signings

by RoyalBlue » 02 Sep 2009 12:50

Royalwaster Harper has a 60% sell on clause? His wages are not much less than 20k a week. We save about £800k by loaning him out, or we could sell for what was said to be about £1.8m - 60%. Together the football club have saved £3m by letting these two go. That's what it comes down to.


I'd say worth pasting your message into every thread - as it is pretty much the only one that makes sense.[/quote]

Only it doesn't make sense at all. It seems to overlook the fact that if we were to sell Harper we would still save his wages!


papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

Re: New signings

by papereyes » 02 Sep 2009 12:50

Happy to see the back of those senior players you mentioned. What concerns me is why we loaned out Harper and Rosenior to our rivals instead of trying to get a permanent £? Especially as both are out of contract next Summer


With less than a year to go on their contract, I'd imagine we'd get very little for them anyway.

Rivals bit is a bit harder to justify, mind.

rotherwick_royal
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 21 Sep 2006 15:08
Location: In a field in Hampshire

Re: New signings

by rotherwick_royal » 02 Sep 2009 12:52

Ideal
That Friday Feeling I would imagine the 40% sell on clause we'd owe Arsenal made just getting him off the wage roll a more attractive proposition.


Well I'mm no rocket scientist, but isn't 60% out of £2 million a whole lot more than £0?? which seems to be what we're getting for him by loaning him out.


I guess once Wolves walked away there was nobody else in for him. Financially this is the next best thing.

User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

Re: New signings

by TFF » 02 Sep 2009 12:52

What £2million?

Not being picked in our starting XI, not match fit and in the last year of his contract. No way he was worth that much. The figures mentioned in the Wolves deal were pure speculation.

A loan move to a competitive team would appeal to him and save us (a large slice of) his wages. Listing him at £2M and sitting him in the reserves while we wait for even lower bids in January wouldn't make much sense.

User avatar
(.)Boobies(.)
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: 13 Feb 2009 21:08
Location: North London

Re: New signings

by (.)Boobies(.) » 02 Sep 2009 12:52

RoyalBlue Only it doesn't make sense at all. It seems to overlook the fact that if we were to sell Harper we would still save his wages!


You're stating the obvious. No one offered us money for Harper apart from Wolves, and that fell through. Plan B - loan him out and save the considerable wages he was on.


User avatar
Deadlock
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2979
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:07
Location: There's nothing of value there and the people make very poor slaves.

Re: New signings

by Deadlock » 02 Sep 2009 12:54

Ideal
That Friday Feeling I would imagine the 40% sell on clause we'd owe Arsenal made just getting him off the wage roll a more attractive proposition.


Well I'mm no rocket scientist, but isn't 60% out of £2 million a whole lot more than £0?? which seems to be what we're getting for him by loaning him out.

You don't know that. Loans can command a fee.

User avatar
Row Z Royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10365
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 20:01
Location: LOLandmarks come and go. There'll only ever be one "Clickety Clique"

Re: New signings

by Row Z Royal » 02 Sep 2009 12:54

papereyes
Happy to see the back of those senior players you mentioned. What concerns me is why we loaned out Harper and Rosenior to our rivals instead of trying to get a permanent £? Especially as both are out of contract next Summer


With less than a year to go on their contract, I'd imagine we'd get very little for them anyway.

Rivals bit is a bit harder to justify, mind.


May I be bold and suggest that Sheff Utd aren't our rivals this season?

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12370
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: New signings

by Maguire » 02 Sep 2009 12:57

Of course they are :-/

User avatar
Whore Jackie
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2885
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 13:48
Location: Over 'ere

Re: New signings

by Whore Jackie » 02 Sep 2009 12:57

RoyalBlue Only it doesn't make sense at all. It seems to overlook the fact that if we were to sell Harper we would still save his wages!


Presumably once the Wolves deal fell through, there were no other suitors. So we continue to pay top-whack wages to someone who’s not part of BR’s plans or we loan him out and bring in someone who can potentially fill a hole in the squad, probably on lower money?


Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: New signings

by Sun Tzu » 02 Sep 2009 12:58

RoyalBlue
Royalwaster Harper has a 60% sell on clause? His wages are not much less than 20k a week. We save about £800k by loaning him out, or we could sell for what was said to be about £1.8m - 60%. Together the football club have saved £3m by letting these two go. That's what it comes down to.


I'd say worth pasting your message into every thread - as it is pretty much the only one that makes sense.


Only it doesn't make sense at all. It seems to overlook the fact that if we were to sell Harper we would still save his wages![/quote]

No, if you sell someone before their contract is up chances are youhave to pay up their contract (or a proportion of it). Send them out on loan and this may not apply.

Additionally many loan deals include a fee payable to the club holding the registration.

It is possible (but I have no idea if it is the case) that by loaning HArps out we are no longer paying his wages, are not liable to pay him any compensation for terminating his deal early and are getting a largish sum in cash back from Sheff Utd.

However I am very sad he's gone !!

User avatar
Row Z Royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10365
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 20:01
Location: LOLandmarks come and go. There'll only ever be one "Clickety Clique"

Re: New signings

by Row Z Royal » 02 Sep 2009 12:59

Maguire Of course they are :-/


We might not like them, but are we realistically going to be competing for the same league positions?

Not if they're in the play-off places.

ellpryjon
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 13:19
Location: bring it on?

Re: New signings

by ellpryjon » 02 Sep 2009 13:03

Royalwaster Harper has a 60% sell on clause? His wages are not much less than 20k a week. We save about £800k by loaning him out, or we could sell for what was said to be about £1.8m - 60%. Together the football club have saved £3m by letting these two go. That's what it comes down to.


I'd say worth pasting your message into every thread - as it is pretty much the only one that makes sense.[/quote]

+1

User avatar
(.)Boobies(.)
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: 13 Feb 2009 21:08
Location: North London

Re: New signings

by (.)Boobies(.) » 02 Sep 2009 13:07

ellpryjon
Royalwaster
(.)Boobies(.) Harper has a 60% sell on clause? His wages are not much less than 20k a week. We save about £800k by loaning him out, or we could sell for what was said to be about £1.8m - 60%. Together the football club have saved £3m by letting these two go. That's what it comes down to.


I'd say worth pasting your message into every thread - as it is pretty much the only one that makes sense.


+1


Then quote it right. :wink:

User avatar
AF1
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1768
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 19:11
Location: Ya got guns, got guns too, what up son, do you wanna battle for cash and see who Sun Tzu?

Re: New signings

by AF1 » 02 Sep 2009 13:22

Barney So let me just check what has happened so far.

We got relegated from the Prem, and then choked the playoffs. So a lot of folks on
here called for Coppell to go. In amongst this time, a bucket load of players got
slaughtered (Murty, Hannaman, Duberry, Lita, Rosenior, Shunt, Harper to name a few).

So the club brought a young-ish manager in, and are trying something different. A lot of
the 'old guard' have gone, and hand on heart has Harper REALLY played that well recently ?
Are we REALLY going to miss Rosenior ?
Rightly or wrongly, Rodgers and the board are trying something different. Mills, Cummins, O'Dea
will be busting a gut to do well here. And for the first time in a while, we are seeing players come
through from the Academy. Will it work ? Who knows. I for one think it is a breath of fresh air, and whilst
I appreciate what Harper, USA, Doyle, Murty etc etc did for Reading FC it is time to move on.
This is part of what following your club is about. Good luck to you Rodgers. Let's start a new chapter,




not reading all that shit tbh

ellpryjon
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 13:19
Location: bring it on?

Re: New signings

by ellpryjon » 02 Sep 2009 13:29

Pedro
Groundhog Day
Goderz
I'd say worth pasting your message into every thread - as it is pretty much the only one that makes sense.


+1


Then quote it right. :wink:


Sorry, wont happen again :wink:

User avatar
Gus the teenage cow
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1046
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 19:18
Location: "God is dead"-Nietzsche 1882................."Nietzsche is dead"-God 1900

Re: New signings

by Gus the teenage cow » 02 Sep 2009 14:01

is it possible the 500k quoted for howard was written off as a loan fee for harper and in fact we didn't pay anything for howard

1201 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Snowflake Royal and 344 guests

It is currently 09 Aug 2025 16:19