by working class hero » 22 Aug 2009 20:51
by Man Friday » 22 Aug 2009 21:02
North Somerset Royal Someone commented early on that it was men against boys
by Man Friday » 22 Aug 2009 21:04
tomrfcurz First half - Good
Second - Back to Newcastle/Forest style
by I was there at Elm Park » 22 Aug 2009 21:06
by LoyalRoyal22 » 22 Aug 2009 21:08
John Madejski's Wallet Can I just say that Mills looks like a useless sack of sh*te.
Let the player in front of him for a shot in the first couple of mins. awful backpass to Fed....... and EVERY sodding defensive header dropped lamely to an onrushing sheff utd player
by LoyalRoyal22 » 22 Aug 2009 21:09
tomrfcurz First half - Good
Second - Back to Newcastle/Forest style
MoTM was Jay Tabb in my eyes, brilliant performance
by LoyalRoyal22 » 22 Aug 2009 21:10
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 22 Aug 2009 21:11
by LoyalRoyal22 » 22 Aug 2009 21:12
winchester_royalhandbags_harriswinchester_royal Good performance I thought.
Sadly though the youngsters have little chance of gaining any confidence because of the inbred morons who call themselves RFC fans.
That was a good performance? Are you kidding, or have you just had more to drink than me? It was abject, not down to the personnel, but solely down to the man in charge of team affairs getting it horrendously wrong.
There were some problems. Like having Cisse in midfield. But there were certainly positive signs IMO.
Siggurdson in particular looked class. The mix of direct, and patient play was better and more balanced, we just lack a decent striker (Smith) and winger.
This team will come good, assuming the players aren't completely demoralised by our moronic fanbase.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 22 Aug 2009 21:14
chilipepper91 The minute the team was announced, I tried to work out in my mind how this team was going to work. 5-3-2, Cissé at centre-back? 4-5-1, Tabb and Hunt on the wings? 4-4-2, Tabb and Siggy on the wings? Nope, a 4-4-2 diamond, with 4 central midfielders, and absolutely no width. Ok, at least we'll dominate the middle of the park. Nope, every time they got the ball they looked dangerous.
First half, we were alright. Knocked it around nicely, a few good chances, and 1-0 up everything was peachy. Then the inevitable lapse of concentration only inexperience can bring, and it's 1-1, and the game was slipping away.
Second half, we were found out. All they did was knock it wide every time, knowing we had absolutely no width. Sure, their second goal was a Federici mistake, but where was the closing down? Same for the third?
The problem I had with today was that every time, we tried to play it out wide. Despite the fact that anybody could see that our only wide players were our wing-backs. There was nobody even remotely in a wing position to support Bertrand and Rosenior. We looked more dangerous, for sure, but we also conceded 3 goals in open play.
Ratings...
Federici - 4 - Distribution OK, 2nd goal was obvious mistake, maybe that knocked his confidence for the 3rd.
Rosenior - 5 - Did an OK job. Might have been at fault for their first.
Mills - 4 - Turned in the first minute, poor defensively, looked good passing. Scored, though that doesn't boost his mark.
Pearce - 6 - One of 4 players who, I thought, actually looked up to the job today. Competent on the ball.
Bertrand - 6 - Good attacking, worse defending. 2 good runs.
Karacan - 6 - Good in possession, cleaned up well.
Cissé - 3 - I don't remember a significant contribution.
Tabb - 7 - Always ran, good tackles, good passes. MOTM.
Sigurdsson - 5 - Apart from "that" shot, didn't really do anything.
Hunt - 5 - Ran a bit.
Long - 4 - Ran a bit less.
Subs:
Church - 3 - See Cissé.
Harper - 4 - Waved his arms a bit.
Tactics: 2 - Once they'd figured us out, it was all over.
by wolsey » 22 Aug 2009 21:15
LoyalRoyal22 There were some problems. Like having Cisse in midfield. But there were certainly positive signs IMO.
Siggurdson in particular looked class. The mix of direct, and patient play was better and more balanced, we just lack a decent striker (Smith) and winger.
This team will come good, assuming the players aren't completely demoralised by our moronic fanbase.
Totally agree with your comments, spot on.
by SLAMMED » 22 Aug 2009 21:17
wolsey Would you have been happy with this performance /result this time last year?
by wolsey » 22 Aug 2009 21:17
SLAMMEDwolsey Would you have been happy with this performance /result this time last year?
You can't compare last season with this season. Last year we had experienced players, this year we have an unproven manager and a team of youngsters.
by SLAMMED » 22 Aug 2009 21:20
by Victor Meldrew » 22 Aug 2009 21:20
by North Somerset Royal » 22 Aug 2009 21:26
I was there at Elm Park We were unlucky that we were playing against a team who will finish in the play offs. I know it's not much consolation but today's first half performance would have beaten most teams and we could have been a few up.
by SteveRoyal » 22 Aug 2009 21:28
Ideal Exactly, it's the truth. He's unfairly forcing Harper&Matejovsky out, just for the sake of it.
by willz_royal » 22 Aug 2009 21:28
by yappy » 22 Aug 2009 21:30
by SteveRoyal » 22 Aug 2009 21:34
Users browsing this forum: Chameleon, Majestic-12 [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 221 guests