by Hoop Blah »
18 Jul 2008 10:43
Royal Rother Hoop Blah We did have successful spells without Kitson in the side, but we looked a better team with Kitson playing and Coppell frequently talked about Kitson being the central player to the way he wanted to the team to play.....
Would you not agree that our best ever team was the one that took us to 8th in the Premier League? Kitson (through no fault of his own of course) didn't contribute a lot to that achievement.
I'd agree that it was our most successful side yes, that's kind of why I said we had successful spells without him in the side. I would agrue that we were a better, more attractive more threatening side with more attacking options (and defending for that matter) with Kitson in the side.
In my opinion, our best ever team includes Kitson.
Royal Rother We played very well without him for most of that season and will do so again next season I'm sure.
Move on, look forwards not backwards. Sure, he was class at times and was great to watch but you place an unrealistic amount of importance on his contribution to the team.
Maybe it is unrealistic importance because we managed to carry on our success without him for the 06-07 season. Personally I just think we were better with him and he's a cog that isn't easily replaced in the squad. I'd much rather watch a side with a player of his type getting the ball down and bringing others into the game as opposed to yet another pacey more one-dimensional centre forward working the channels and playing the percentages.
We will move on without him, of course we will. I don't think I've said otherwise, I've just said that he will be
almost impossible to replace with a like for like player.