by Riseley » 20 Feb 2008 11:27
by Woodcote Royal » 20 Feb 2008 11:32
Schards#2 :lol: @ Woodcote ROFLoyal
WHAT A COMPLETE WAthis post has been moderated - 11.22am 20/02/2008
by Royal Lady » 20 Feb 2008 11:39
by T.R.O.L.I. » 20 Feb 2008 11:40
by Woodcote Royal » 20 Feb 2008 11:46
Royal Lady LOL - it wasn't moderated you fool - he typed it like that!![]()
![]()
by Royal Lady » 20 Feb 2008 11:47
by T.R.O.L.I. » 20 Feb 2008 11:47
Woodcote RoyalRoyal Lady LOL - it wasn't moderated you fool - he typed it like that!![]()
![]()
What a brilliant piece of deception..........................
by Schards#2 » 20 Feb 2008 11:48
by Woodcote Royal » 20 Feb 2008 12:04
T.R.O.L.I.Woodcote RoyalRoyal Lady LOL - it wasn't moderated you fool - he typed it like that!![]()
![]()
What a brilliant piece of deception..........................
But one that you fell for, WR
by Royal Lady » 20 Feb 2008 12:07
by Royal Lady » 20 Feb 2008 12:09
by Schards#2 » 20 Feb 2008 12:11
Woodcote RoyalT.R.O.L.I.Woodcote Royal
What a brilliant piece of deception..........................
But one that you fell for, WR
Thanks for reminding why I haven't posted for the last few weeks.
Who gives a fcuk whether this post was edited or not, I was responding to another clear reference to the "complete w@nker" jibe, meaning, if that's ok, so is middle class twat.
I don't care what anyone calls me but when Mr & Mrs Sad B@stard, one of whom being a so called moderator, has the brass neck to complain when they get it back with interest, I'm going to make my case as when the mood takes me........................and keep better company when it doesn't.
by Woodcote Royal » 20 Feb 2008 12:16
Royal Lady Oh and Woodcote, I didn't complain, I merely asked you why you persisted in calling him a tw@t, a MiddLOLe CLOLass one at that!
by Wycombe Royal » 20 Feb 2008 12:21
by Vision » 20 Feb 2008 12:23
Woodcote RoyalRoyal Lady Oh and Woodcote, I didn't complain, I merely asked you why you persisted in calling him a tw@t, a MiddLOLe CLOLass one at that!
Well, if you're really not complaining, you, me and your middle class twat of a husband will have to do this all again sometime
by Schards#2 » 20 Feb 2008 12:24
VisionWoodcote RoyalRoyal Lady Oh and Woodcote, I didn't complain, I merely asked you why you persisted in calling him a tw@t, a MiddLOLe CLOLass one at that!
Well, if you're really not complaining, you, me and your middle class twat of a husband will have to do this all again sometime
I'm out of touch but is this the "cyber sex" phenomenon i've read about in the Daily Mail.
by Royal Lady » 20 Feb 2008 12:27
and he doesn't mean himself or meSchards#2Vision
I'm out of touch but is this the "cyber sex" phenomenon i've read about in the Daily Mail.
It's as close as it gets for some.
by Dirk Gently » 20 Feb 2008 12:30
Wycombe Royal The funniest thing about all this is that this childish argument is between some of the more "mature" residents of this forum.![]()
by West Stand Man » 20 Feb 2008 14:05
Schards#2
![]()
It's dead in the water mate, there isn't the demand.
Accept you got it wrong and move on.
West Stand ManSchards#2
![]()
It's dead in the water mate, there isn't the demand.
Accept you got it wrong and move on.
Can someone log this post for future reference - just in case we have to get the humble pie out for Mr 'Black and White' when / if the expansion does kick in.Just a quick reminder that when the Madeski was first built there was no demand for anything above about 12k, yet we got a 24k stadium and it is now filling up on a regular basis. Good marketing involves developing the product - in this case the product includes the stadium.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 105 guests