by Archie's penalty » 04 Apr 2007 15:59
by Scarface » 04 Apr 2007 16:14
by Royalee » 04 Apr 2007 17:07
Whore JackieRoyaleeWhore JackieHuntley & Palmer I think Seol not being on the bench gives an impression of the current pecking order for me. Oster's sub appearances have warranted a start in the absence of Little, with Seol and Halford on the bench if Murty isn't fit,
Spot on. I really hope he doesn't play Doyle on the wing again.
I hope he plays Doyle on the left wing.
He's wasted there. Hunt was poor on Sunday (like the rest of midfield) but I'd still start him, he'll be well up for a dual against Finnan.
I'd rather play Doyle and Lita up front. Liverpool are more than capable of dealing with long balls, much better to test them with some pace and trickery.
by Whore Jackie » 04 Apr 2007 17:43
RoyaleeWhore JackieRoyaleeWhore JackieHuntley & Palmer I think Seol not being on the bench gives an impression of the current pecking order for me. Oster's sub appearances have warranted a start in the absence of Little, with Seol and Halford on the bench if Murty isn't fit,
Spot on. I really hope he doesn't play Doyle on the wing again.
I hope he plays Doyle on the left wing.
He's wasted there. Hunt was poor on Sunday (like the rest of midfield) but I'd still start him, he'll be well up for a dual against Finnan.
I'd rather play Doyle and Lita up front. Liverpool are more than capable of dealing with long balls, much better to test them with some pace and trickery.
Kitson's hardly disgraced himself when he's played and he needs to carry on playing. He works well with Lita and Doyle would do far better than Hunt on the wing - he uses the ball far better and would link up with Shorey. I'm not basing my reasons for dropping Hunt on the Spurs game alone - he's been consistently poor since January.
by brendywendy » 04 Apr 2007 17:57
by Millsy » 04 Apr 2007 18:19
Archie's penalty Happy to see Oster having the chance to start - sure I'm unhappy about the Little situation but let's see what Oster can do!
by RobRoyal » 04 Apr 2007 18:52
2 world wars, 1 world cupArchie's penalty Happy to see Oster having the chance to start - sure I'm unhappy about the Little situation but let's see what Oster can do!
Exactly.
Can anyone think of a time when an injury has happened under Coppell and we were left seriously affected by it? I certainly can't.
by Victor Meldrew » 04 Apr 2007 19:31
by doylefan » 04 Apr 2007 19:44
by Alan Partridge » 04 Apr 2007 19:47
by rotherwick_royal » 05 Apr 2007 12:24
by brendywendy » 05 Apr 2007 12:32
by SpaceCruiser » 05 Apr 2007 12:34
rotherwick_royal Definitely NOT a game for sulky Hyeon
by rotherwick_royal » 05 Apr 2007 12:44
SpaceCruiserrotherwick_royal Definitely NOT a game for sulky Hyeon
What makes you think he's sulky?
by Yorkshire Royal » 05 Apr 2007 13:05
by RoyalBlue » 05 Apr 2007 13:15
rotherwick_royalSpaceCruiserrotherwick_royal Definitely NOT a game for sulky Hyeon
What makes you think he's sulky?
Well here's one definition....
"sullen, idle, lazy, slow, become sluggish, be weak or idle"
Think that sums up some of his performances.
Oh, and it's a play on words
by Behindu » 05 Apr 2007 13:19
Victor Meldrew On looking back I can't see the reason for Little continuing to play through an injury.
by brendywendy » 05 Apr 2007 13:36
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], South Coast Royal and 557 guests
