by Far Canal » 02 Apr 2007 00:03
by Adrian's Fool » 02 Apr 2007 09:32
by el_presidente » 02 Apr 2007 09:56
by Irvinchangeyaname » 02 Apr 2007 10:04
by papereyes » 02 Apr 2007 10:06
by willz_royal » 02 Apr 2007 10:41
by Huntley & Palmer » 02 Apr 2007 12:06
by PieEater » 02 Apr 2007 12:13
by VOR » 02 Apr 2007 12:24
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Apr 2007 12:30
VOR Of course it wasn't a pen but look at the shots stats; they could have been 3 up after 10 minutes.
by RoyalBlue » 02 Apr 2007 13:28
VOR For once a good, balanced press report that reflects our counter-attacking ability but also the fact that Spursch had the better of the game. Of course it wasn't a pen but look at the shots stats; they could have been 3 up after 10 minutes.
So why all the whingeing?? Two pens we should've had? Another case of Cyclops syndrome?
by Dirk Gently » 02 Apr 2007 13:50
RoyalBlueVOR For once a good, balanced press report that reflects our counter-attacking ability but also the fact that Spursch had the better of the game. Of course it wasn't a pen but look at the shots stats; they could have been 3 up after 10 minutes.
So why all the whingeing?? Two pens we should've had? Another case of Cyclops syndrome?
Maybe - but one penalty we definitely should have had. The pundits on MOTD were unanimous that if the Halford incident was a penalty then Dawson's handball was far more deserving of a spot kick.
by readingfc_4_life_and_beyo » 02 Apr 2007 14:17
SpaceCruiserVOR Of course it wasn't a pen but look at the shots stats; they could have been 3 up after 10 minutes.
So? Doesn't mean anything.
by Mr Angry » 02 Apr 2007 16:27
by Mr Angry » 02 Apr 2007 16:36
by Mr Angry » 02 Apr 2007 16:38
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Apr 2007 16:50
Mr Angry, quoting Daily Mirror on-line, his collection of car-boot cast-offs
by RoyalBlue » 02 Apr 2007 17:32
SpaceCruiserMr Angry, quoting Daily Mirror on-line, his collection of car-boot cast-offs
I really do take offence to that. It shows the level of ignorance the author of that article shows, as if saying that our players are not that good. But then what do you expect of a scraggy little gutter paper like the Mirror.
by Behindu » 02 Apr 2007 17:35
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Apr 2007 17:46
RoyalBlueSpaceCruiserMr Angry, quoting Daily Mirror on-line, his collection of car-boot cast-offs
I really do take offence to that. It shows the level of ignorance the author of that article shows, as if saying that our players are not that good. But then what do you expect of a scraggy little gutter paper like the Mirror.
You really are too sensitive! I thought that overall it was a pretty complimentary report as far as we were concerned. Very definitely came out in our favour re Wileys decisions on penalties. Summed up Wiley's reaction to Keane's claim perfectly in my eyes. He clearly responded to the appeals rather than what he had seen with his own eyes and his hesitation emphasised that.
And if you know what you are looking for you can get some cracking quality bargain buys at car boot sales just as Sir Steve does in the transfer market.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], tmesis and 475 guests
