Forbury LionI hear he's a founder memberOnce were Biscuitmen As long as Zamora has not become a fully fledged member of the West Ham, lazy Bling-bling club he would be a good buy.
That appears to be be the general consensus of West Ham fans.
by Hoop Blah » 03 Jan 2007 17:06
Forbury LionI hear he's a founder memberOnce were Biscuitmen As long as Zamora has not become a fully fledged member of the West Ham, lazy Bling-bling club he would be a good buy.
by One Beer is never enough. » 03 Jan 2007 17:11
That Friday Feeling Do we just forget the ball-boy thing?
by Huntley & Palmer » 03 Jan 2007 17:13
by Yorkshire Royal » 03 Jan 2007 17:17
huntley and palmer Zamora would be decent business and a combination of him and Doyle or Lita should work well. He has a good ability to hold the ball up and does well with the ball at his feet.
by Finchley Royal » 03 Jan 2007 17:20
by Matt de K » 03 Jan 2007 17:38
by ScottishRoyal » 03 Jan 2007 17:43
Yorkshire Royalhuntley and palmer Zamora would be decent business and a combination of him and Doyle or Lita should work well. He has a good ability to hold the ball up and does well with the ball at his feet.
I thought Mullins might be a good purchase, but they seem to absolutely hate him in the East End (sorry Essex).
by Maguire » 03 Jan 2007 17:43
Huntley & Palmer The bling bling crowd at WHU are Reo-Coker, Mullins, Konchesky and Harewood according to the ST holder here in my office.
by Northern Git » 03 Jan 2007 18:17
by RoyalBlue » 03 Jan 2007 18:51
by RoyalBlue » 03 Jan 2007 18:54
Stranded As I've said before, Zamora has made it clear in the past how much he respects Coppell and how much he would like to play under him again. I would suggest if Coppell is in for him that the respect is a two way street and that there would be no attitude problems.
Also I think a few are assuming that he is one of the West Ham players with an attitude problem without any real proof to back that up.
by Platypuss » 10 Jan 2007 22:50
by The whole year inn » 10 Jan 2007 23:08
by total_biscuit » 10 Jan 2007 23:30
The whole year inn I am not at all easy with Reading paying 2.5 million for a player with limited 2nd tier experience, let alone Premiership.
But what do I know?
by The whole year inn » 10 Jan 2007 23:42
by Dirk Gently » 11 Jan 2007 00:02
The whole year inn I don't buy all this England U20 business either. Some incredibly ordinary players have turned out for the U20's in recent times, it means next to nothing IMO.
by exileinleeds » 11 Jan 2007 00:17
by royaldownunder » 11 Jan 2007 00:36
The whole year inn I am not at all easy with Reading paying 2.5 million for a player with limited 2nd tier experience, let alone Premiership.
But what do I know?
by royaldownunder » 11 Jan 2007 00:42
exileinleeds I think one thing that Steve has to be looking for, is a possible replacement for Sidders if he is not going to renew....his will not be easy boots to fill.
by The whole year inn » 11 Jan 2007 00:55
royaldownunderThe whole year inn I am not at all easy with Reading paying 2.5 million for a player with limited 2nd tier experience, let alone Premiership.
But what do I know?
They obviously aren't keen to see him go - being as we are now in the premiership, it means paying inflated prices for players we would have bought for half the price had we been a championship side...
Lucky for us, Sir Coppell's a scouse miser and will only part with the cash if it's absolutely worth it!
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Orion1871, WestYorksRoyal and 423 guests
