by melonhead » 09 Jan 2013 12:12
by Extended-Phenotype » 09 Jan 2013 12:31
by melonhead » 09 Jan 2013 12:41
Extended-Phenotype Sure, but where do you get the notion that Brian didn’t ask for a budget or TSI didn’t ask him what figure he required?
Not saying he did or was, just wondered where the obstinacy that he is free of liability comes from.
by Hoop Blah » 09 Jan 2013 12:56
melonhead pretty sure weve always given the budget to the manager and he works within it
quotes from coppell before the crawley game(which i pretty much see as being brians opinion, seeing how close they are) seem to back up the idea that they were surprised how low it was, and didnt think it was any way near enough.
.
by Hoop Blah » 09 Jan 2013 13:02
melonheadExtended-Phenotype Sure, but where do you get the notion that Brian didn’t ask for a budget or TSI didn’t ask him what figure he required?
Not saying he did or was, just wondered where the obstinacy that he is free of liability comes from.
never ever said he was free of liabilty.
hes clearly not
he was replying to people questioning our poor start, and whether we had spent enough to stay up, and he said hed been given a budget, and had spent it all.
seemed a pretty clear rebuttal of that to me.
(see also coppells comments which seem to back that up, and i would assume is brians voice by proxy)
im also aware that this may just be me of course
by melonhead » 09 Jan 2013 13:09
by Hoop Blah » 09 Jan 2013 13:27
by melonhead » 09 Jan 2013 15:07
IF such a definitive budget was set in the summer, do you not think McDermott would've been involved in those budget setting discussions?
by Extended-Phenotype » 09 Jan 2013 17:06
by Ian Royal » 09 Jan 2013 17:31
melonhead nope.
multiple quotes. non contradictory.
i got everyone i wanted doesnt contradict i was given a budget and spent it all
by Hoop Blah » 09 Jan 2013 18:21
melonheadIF such a definitive budget was set in the summer, do you not think McDermott would've been involved in those budget setting discussions?
i "imagine" that the coversations went like this:
AZ-so what do you think we need to ensure we stay up?
BM-about 40 million quid, not including wages and a total rebuild, and that still wont guarantee survival, and is against what we stand for, plus i dont think changing the whole team in one summer will ever work.
AZ-ok, cant do that then, what are our other options?
BM-we cover the 6 positions we need with as much quality/experience as we can afford, give the current squad a chance, and if we go down, use the parachutes to keep building the squad properly
AZ-ok. i can give you about 15 million in total.
BM-fine, thanks, ill do what i can with that.
by tee peg » 10 Jan 2013 09:35
by Royalclapper » 10 Jan 2013 09:57
by melonhead » 10 Jan 2013 10:26
Hoop BlahmelonheadIF such a definitive budget was set in the summer, do you not think McDermott would've been involved in those budget setting discussions?
i "imagine" that the coversations went like this:
AZ-so what do you think we need to ensure we stay up?
BM-about 40 million quid, not including wages and a total rebuild, and that still wont guarantee survival, and is against what we stand for, plus i dont think changing the whole team in one summer will ever work.
AZ-ok, cant do that then, what are our other options?
BM-we cover the 6 positions we need with as much quality/experience as we can afford, give the current squad a chance, and if we go down, use the parachutes to keep building the squad properly
AZ-ok. i can give you about 15 million in total.
BM-fine, thanks, ill do what i can with that.
See I have a suspicion that, having listened to some of Zingaravich's comments, he probably went into it with a bit more of a 'fantasy football' shopping list (ref his list of 10 players etc) and McDermott was more the one playing down our shopping requirement because of his loyalty to the Championship winning squad.
by UpThePrem » 10 Jan 2013 12:44
by Brianstorm » 10 Jan 2013 13:07
UpThePrem Lazio currently favourites to get Shane if he moves.
by melonhead » 11 Jan 2013 10:41
Hoop Blahmelonhead thats not usually how it works here tbf
How do you think it works then brendy?
Everything I've ever read about the way transfers works is that the manager goes to the powers that be and asks for a player and they review whether or not he can be afforded.
Things may have changed since TSI got involved but Zingaravich was pretty clear of Football Focus that money wasn't the issue over the summer. Brian also said that he go everyone he wanted and spent all that he had. If he wasn't given a specific figure to spend (as we've done it in the past) then it follows that he'd have spent all he was given as he was only given the funds to buy the players he asked for.
There seems to be slightly conflicting stories coming from the two, but not ones I'd suggest are in total disagreement with each other, or are any more than passing comments on the summer from either of them (in other words I wouldn't take either statements too literally).
"I've never had a budget to splash big money and buy £8 million players in my three years as manager here and, until I'm told otherwise, we just have to get on with it.
"I do the very best I can with what I've got. I had to do that in the summer and it's never been any different here. It's not frustrating, it's just how it is."
by LoyalRoyal22 » 11 Jan 2013 16:55
by Ian Royal » 11 Jan 2013 17:51
melonheadHoop Blahmelonhead i "imagine" that the coversations went like this:
AZ-so what do you think we need to ensure we stay up?
BM-about 40 million quid, not including wages and a total rebuild, and that still wont guarantee survival, and is against what we stand for, plus i dont think changing the whole team in one summer will ever work.
AZ-ok, cant do that then, what are our other options?
BM-we cover the 6 positions we need with as much quality/experience as we can afford, give the current squad a chance, and if we go down, use the parachutes to keep building the squad properly
AZ-ok. i can give you about 15 million in total.
BM-fine, thanks, ill do what i can with that.
See I have a suspicion that, having listened to some of Zingaravich's comments, he probably went into it with a bit more of a 'fantasy football' shopping list (ref his list of 10 players etc) and McDermott was more the one playing down our shopping requirement because of his loyalty to the Championship winning squad.
ive heard mcdermott say that yes, there was a list of ten possible players, but that in no way did it mean anton wanted to get ten new players in
by Mike Hunt » 11 Jan 2013 18:10
LoyalRoyal22 I can confirm that Shane Long will return to Reading tomorrow
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 57 guests