by Barry the bird boggler » 19 Nov 2010 12:45
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Nov 2010 12:52
Barry the bird boggler So what would Fryatt exactly add to our squad that we don't already have with Long, Church, Hunt. Surely Bednar would be a far more intelligent move.
by TBM » 19 Nov 2010 12:56
Wycombe RoyalTBM I really thought Cisse could have done that role for us.
Except that he wasn't consistently good enough and the transfer fee from Agent Coppell was too good to turn down.
by andrew1957 » 19 Nov 2010 13:01
Wycombe RoyalBarry the bird boggler So what would Fryatt exactly add to our squad that we don't already have with Long, Church, Hunt. Surely Bednar would be a far more intelligent move.
Do you want me to invite Snowball over to this topic to give us some stats? It will obviously show us that Shane Long is better than all the possibilities, but it will be fun, won't it?
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Nov 2010 13:03
andrew1957Wycombe RoyalBarry the bird boggler So what would Fryatt exactly add to our squad that we don't already have with Long, Church, Hunt. Surely Bednar would be a far more intelligent move.
Do you want me to invite Snowball over to this topic to give us some stats? It will obviously show us that Shane Long is better than all the possibilities, but it will be fun, won't it?
Perhaps we are going to sell Shane in January and Fryatt IS his replacement. Imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth in the Snowball household if that were to happen.
by Ian Royal » 19 Nov 2010 13:03
TBMIan Royal Hasn't Karacan been playing the more defensive role fairly well for us all season?
errrr not really, no.
Karacan is not a holding midfielder - he is far more effective playing that middle role.....someone to win the ball, give it to Jem, he then gives to the man next up (the old Sig role).
by TBM » 19 Nov 2010 14:13
Ian RoyalTBMIan Royal Hasn't Karacan been playing the more defensive role fairly well for us all season?
errrr not really, no.
Karacan is not a holding midfielder - he is far more effective playing that middle role.....someone to win the ball, give it to Jem, he then gives to the man next up (the old Sig role).
Well if he doesn't play it, then we don't use that role, because no one else has played it all season, certainly regularly.
If we don't use that role, then there's no point in buying a player for it.
by The whole year inn » 19 Nov 2010 21:22
by Norfolk Royal » 20 Nov 2010 10:31
The whole year inn Apparently they think the Sonko/KItson deals are an indication of this
by roadrunner » 20 Nov 2010 12:03
Norfolk RoyalThe whole year inn Apparently they think the Sonko/KItson deals are an indication of this
On the basis of the Sonko and Kitson deals I would have thought Stoke would be furious with us.
by loyalroyalsam » 20 Nov 2010 21:22
by warrpp » 20 Nov 2010 21:24
by loyalroyal4life » 21 Nov 2010 20:51
warrpp i'd be happy with that signing
by brendywendy » 22 Nov 2010 12:05
loyalroyal4lifewarrpp i'd be happy with that signing
i would be happy with any signing just as long as it is a striker who has proven he can score GOALS REGULARLY!!
by Yorkshire Royal » 22 Nov 2010 13:15
roadrunnerNorfolk RoyalThe whole year inn Apparently they think the Sonko/KItson deals are an indication of this
On the basis of the Sonko and Kitson deals I would have thought Stoke would be furious with us.
I got the impression TWYI's comment was very much tongue in cheek..
by loyalroyal4life » 22 Nov 2010 19:44
by URZZZZZZZZ » 23 Nov 2010 23:34
by Wycombe Royal » 24 Nov 2010 09:09
URZZZZZZZZ Bednar going to Leicester in the next couple of days.
We really are the most uninspiring team to support.
by Elmer Park » 24 Nov 2010 09:37
by pea » 24 Nov 2010 09:41
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests