Compo's Hat I'm not reading 65 pages of this!!!
Roughly two thirds of it is contributions just like this
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=90631&p=2291930#p2291930
by Arch » 25 Aug 2009 00:58
Compo's Hat I'm not reading 65 pages of this!!!
by Compo's Hat » 25 Aug 2009 01:03
ArchCompo's Hat I'm not reading 65 pages of this!!!
Roughly two thirds of it is contributions just like this
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=90631&p=2291930#p2291930
by Woodcote Royal » 25 Aug 2009 04:25
Huntley & Palmer(.)Boobies(.)Huntley & Palmer LOL @ most people on this thread when he signs in the next 48 hours
Not really. Old John knows the supports are turning volatile towards him, not the team, and not the manager. He really has very little choice but to show the fans their 'wrong' and get them back onside.
LOL @ a few people on an internet message board turning 'volatile'. People are far too impatient after the most successful period in this club's history, it's farcical really
by Pseud O'Nym » 25 Aug 2009 05:11
Woodcote RoyalHuntley & Palmer(.)Boobies(.)
Not really. Old John knows the supports are turning volatile towards him, not the team, and not the manager. He really has very little choice but to show the fans their 'wrong' and get them back onside.
LOL @ a few people on an internet message board turning 'volatile'. People are far too impatient after the most successful period in this club's history, it's farcical really
+ 2
There has been some cr@p written on this board down the year's but some of the utter sh*te we've witnessed since Saturday just beggars belief.
So, having spent £2m on a centre half when a five a year old could have come up with a reasonable excuse for spending a fraction of that amount on a cheaper alternative, our supposedly tight fisted, multi millionaire chairman is now trying to pay Watford way over the odds for a 29 year old forward.
And why is he doing this.............................because he's being intimidated by a bunch of idiots from the south east corner![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by bigmike » 25 Aug 2009 07:21
Woodcote Royal + 2
There has been some cr@p written on this board down the year's but some of the utter sh*te we've witnessed since Saturday just beggars belief.
So, having spent £2m on a centre half when a five a year old could have come up with a reasonable excuse for spending a fraction of that amount on a cheaper alternative, our supposedly tight fisted, multi millionaire chairman is now trying to pay Watford way over the odds for a 29 year old forward.
And why is he doing this.............................because he's being intimidated by a bunch of idiots from the south east corner![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Royalwaster » 25 Aug 2009 07:51
by bigmike » 25 Aug 2009 08:10
Royalwaster If this goes through this will be a total spend of £3.8 million so far plus whatever loan fee we played for the Chelsea rent boy. That's a lot more than we ever spent prior to going up .... remember when £1million for LL seemed a lot of money!
by Big Foot » 25 Aug 2009 08:51
Royalwaster If this goes through this will be a total spend of £3.8 million so far plus whatever loan fee we played for the Chelsea rent boy. That's a lot more than we ever spent prior to going up .... remember when £1million for LL seemed a lot of money!
by Royal Lady » 25 Aug 2009 08:54
by Big Foot » 25 Aug 2009 08:55
by Big Foot » 25 Aug 2009 08:56
Royal Lady Mr Mad said earlier on Radio Berks that a statement is going to be issued stating "where the money has gone" - he also said it wasn't his idea to name the stadium after him.
by Row Z Royal » 25 Aug 2009 09:00
Thaumagurist*It Is What It Is But if he becomes a bit of a flop...
YOUR WORSE THAN JIMMY KEBE
YOUR WORSE THAN JIMMY KEBE
You should have signed for pomp-ay ( Portsmouth not Pompeii before you say)
Your mother is a donkey...
I'm more of a positive lyracist tbh, so this one isn't great
Can you improve your terrible English first before posting anymore, please?
by Schards#2 » 25 Aug 2009 09:01
Royalwaster If this goes through this will be a total spend of £3.8 million so far plus whatever loan fee we played for the Chelsea rent boy. That's a lot more than we ever spent prior to going up .... remember when £1million for LL seemed a lot of money!
by Royal Lady » 25 Aug 2009 09:02
It will definitely be more spin - as I said the other day, a lot of Reading fans won't be easily appeased now- it's the third season in a row where our activity in the transfer market appears to be slower than a slow thing on a slow day.Big FootRoyal Lady Mr Mad said earlier on Radio Berks that a statement is going to be issued stating "where the money has gone" - he also said it wasn't his idea to name the stadium after him.
It'll be yet more pro-Madejski propaganda no doubt although the angle of spin will be very interesting.
I think this is possibly the first time in a few years that Madejski has been taken out of his comfort zone
by Alan Partridge » 25 Aug 2009 09:05
Big Foot FAO those who see Tommy Smith as the answer to our lack of goals
1997–2003 - Watford 149 (33)
2003–2004 - Sunderland 37 (4)
2004–2006 - Derby County 92 (20)
2006–2009 - Watford 124 (27)
Such a great goalscoring record!!!
by Barry the bird boggler » 25 Aug 2009 09:05
by The whole year inn » 25 Aug 2009 09:08
Alan PartridgeBig Foot FAO those who see Tommy Smith as the answer to our lack of goals
1997–2003 - Watford 149 (33)
2003–2004 - Sunderland 37 (4)
2004–2006 - Derby County 92 (20)
2006–2009 - Watford 124 (27)
Such a great goalscoring record!!!
Reading still need a proper centre forward.
by southbank1871 » 25 Aug 2009 09:08
by Geekins » 25 Aug 2009 09:09
by Terminal Boardom » 25 Aug 2009 09:12
Geekins I could give it a go if you like and start slating him after Saturday's game....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests