bigmike Ohhh Meltdown here we come..
this is gonna be a great signing for Reading.
Now, this is funny. Love how Big Mike operates.
by robinsfriday » 10 Jan 2013 11:36
bigmike Ohhh Meltdown here we come..
this is gonna be a great signing for Reading.
by royalZILLAAA » 10 Jan 2013 11:37
cmonurz Quite who you think we should be buying as a PL team I don't know.
by robinsfriday » 10 Jan 2013 11:39
royalZILLAAAcmonurz Quite who you think we should be buying as a PL team I don't know.
That's what I want to know as well. What sort of a signing would actually excite you? (winchester, not cmonurz)
by bigmike » 10 Jan 2013 11:39
by Norfolk Royal » 10 Jan 2013 11:40
by winchester_royal » 10 Jan 2013 11:40
cmonurz
Re Welbeck, it's enough the same thing to warrant my comment. So much negativity on here every time we show a bit of impetus and risk in the transfer market.
Quite who you think we should be buying as a PL team I don't know. Players who come risk free aren't interested in Reading. So what's your big idea? We've seen with Zaha what happens when you aren't prepared to take a gamble on someone. And Rhodes scoring record at Blackburn isn't too shabby, if it's a striker we're after.
We don't know if this Palacios deal will go ahead - if it does, how about we live by that oft used mantra 'Brian knows what he is doing?'
by cmonurz » 10 Jan 2013 11:45
by Norfolk Royal » 10 Jan 2013 11:47
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 10 Jan 2013 11:47
by bigmike » 10 Jan 2013 11:48
by Optimist » 10 Jan 2013 11:50
by HoneyRoastHoax » 10 Jan 2013 11:51
Optimist In the article he said they were PL but ruled out Welbeck and Huddlestone... hasn't ruled out Arshavin though...
by TheRoyalJoe » 10 Jan 2013 11:52
by winchester_royal » 10 Jan 2013 11:54
cmonurz It's not a tirade of abuse, but congratulations for trying to turn it into something personal when I was just voicing my opinion, which is the opposite to yours.
Sorry if my responses are coming across in another way, perhaps it's because you appear much of the time to be the club's mouth-piece. That's the second time you've made the point about buying 'young players who will increase in value', but of course when I mentioned Zaha to this point yesterday, you reminded me why, again, that's different.
by Optimist » 10 Jan 2013 11:55
TheRoyalJoe The club that we're in talks with is Newcastle.
by Elm Park Pasty » 10 Jan 2013 11:56
TheRoyalJoe The club that we're in talks with is Newcastle.
by RobRoyal » 10 Jan 2013 11:57
winchester_royal The guy is an unfit Leigertwood. Would much rather see the money spent elsewhere.
by Simon's Church » 10 Jan 2013 11:57
TheRoyalJoe The club that we're in talks with is Newcastle.
by TheRoyalJoe » 10 Jan 2013 11:58
Elm Park PastyTheRoyalJoe The club that we're in talks with is Newcastle.
So in theory, if true, it could all depend on whether Tulisa gives her permission for 'im to come down sarf
by melonhead » 10 Jan 2013 12:00
cmonurz It's not a tirade of abuse, but congratulations for trying to turn it into something personal when I was just voicing my opinion, which is the opposite to yours.
Sorry if my responses are coming across in another way, perhaps it's because you appear much of the time to be the club's mouth-piece. That's the second time you've made the point about buying 'young players who will increase in value', but of course when I mentioned Zaha to this point yesterday, you reminded me why, again, that's different.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests