CheLOLsea

[stealthpapes]

Wot, like David Mellor did?

One of my favourite revelations was finding that Max Clifford made that up.

[sandman]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36307519

Chelsea fined almost twice as much as Tottenham for failing to control their players.

The No Fixed Brain conspiwacy theory generator about to go into overdrive.

[No Fixed Abode]

Chelsea seems to attract court cases. I wonder why?

This Conte thingy has nothing to do with Chelsea.....

But you attract those characters.

Someone who is innocent. Ah righto.

[No Fixed Abode]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36307519

Chelsea fined almost twice as much as Tottenham for failing to control their players.

Well if you didn't already know the FA committee was a joke - further proof right there.

[genome]

I have to say I'm slightly baffled too Kes.

Conspiracy?

[No Fixed Abode]

I have to say I'm slightly baffled too Kes.

Conspiracy?

Well. I can't recall but the ONLY reason I can think Chelsea received a bigger fine is, that perhaps we've been punished for 'failing to control' our players already this season and the higher fine relates to that too. Otherwise, if it's base purely the Spurs game - then there must be some sort of conspiracy.

[Nameless]

Got to be mostly down to Chelsea's long previous record of problems.
Although possibly the fact that the initial incidents in the Spurs game were Chelsea instigated. Their tactics worked a treat that day , good spot that Spurs were probably going to lose it if a few feathers were ruffled early doors.

[No Fixed Abode]

Although possibly the fact that the initial incidents in the Spurs game were Chelsea instigated.

Oh yeah - like Kyle Walker kicking out at Pedro at the start of the 1st half. Chelsea instigated....what game were you watching?

[Nameless]

Although possibly the fact that the initial incidents in the Spurs game were Chelsea instigated.

Oh yeah - like Kyle Walker kicking out at Pedro at the start of the 1st half. Chelsea instigated....what game were you watching?

There were about 3 late tackles from behind very early on, we commented at the time that Chelsea were clearly looking to provoke Spurs into a reaction.
Spurs were too weak to not react.
It was a clever ploy, been done many times, worked well.
But if you think Spurs had anything to gain by starting the rough stuff you are deluded (OK, no news there...)

[No Fixed Abode]

And you resorted to name calling too. Argument well and truly lost there.

[genome]

From revised article:

Chelsea must pay £375,000, having previously breached the Football Association rule on mass confrontations four times since November 2014.

Spurs have been fined £225,000 for what is their third breach of the rule.

[stealthpapes]

From revised article:

Chelsea must pay £375,000, having previously breached the Football Association rule on mass confrontations four times since November 2014.

Spurs have been fined £225,000 for what is their third breach of the rule.

That seems sensible.

[Nameless]

:roll:

And you resorted to name calling too. Argument well and truly lost there.

No name calling .

And you do your usual swerve and raise spurious objections rather than addressing the point.

No argument by the way, you can't argue with facts (Isn't that one of your mantras ?)

[Pepe the Horseman]

At least he had his full kit on whilst playing this time.

What does he usually wear?

[No Fixed Abode]

At least he had his full kit on whilst playing this time.

What does he usually wear?

One of those plaid shirts from NEXT - ya know the type that looks like it was purchased by his missus.

[Pepe the Horseman]

Eurgh. No wonder he went full kit.

[Zammo]

Chelsea fined £375,000 for failing to control their players. Tottenham fined £225,000. Yet CheLOLsea fans were calling for about 4 red cards for Spurs. Not a clue

[No Fixed Abode]

New away kit apparently.

[Hoop Blah]

Take the sponsors off and it looks like pajamas!

[From Despair To Where?]

Well, the team has been asleep for half this season.