by STAR Voice »
09 Nov 2008 11:31
STAR has offered to fund this in full. The issue is, as far as I can understand it, that floral tributes etc which look fine when new are just left to wither and die, and the club are then left with an eyesore of old, dead, bunches of flowers which they then have the responsibility for disposing off.
The club also feel that if that this is encouraged it will grow, so instead of 1 or 2 occasional bunches of flowers, etc there will be a constant 20 or 30 bunches of flowers, which would be an eyesore when dead and might be a health and safety issue. As Whistle says, "This is a football ground, not a graveyard or a church or a sacred place for ancestor worship." and that view is shared by the club for operational reasons.
Personally, I think that's a pretty disappointing response, as the club are clearly failing to understand just how important this is to a significant number of their supporters. The blanket "no" that the club has given is not fitting for a club which publicly prides itself on being a "community club" and in touch with its supporters. In this case, minimal effort and minimal cost to the club would result in significant goodwill from many supporters. I'm not saying that the "flower rings" are the best option, but certainly I feel that there needs to be some discussion, and I'm sure a solution can be found that suits everyone.
On the subject of remembrance, I'm posting this today in great surprise and disappointment that there wasn't a minute's silence before yesterday's match - and the majority of people around me were surprised too. With British forces currently involved in two bloody conflicts, on the 90th anniversary of the end of the First World War, for a "community club" which has such close links to the Army at Arborfield not to do more than put poppies on the scoreboard is very surprising. Even more so as the majority of other teams, including those in the PL who are famous for not caring about anything except themselves - thought it proper to do this