by Vision » 26 Aug 2009 14:19
by Royal Lady » 26 Aug 2009 14:22
Yeah, cos that's, like, cheating - because they can take their pick of the crop of talent from both Windsor AND Eton and Hampton AND Richmond.Vision No good can ever come of following double barrelled clubs.
Windsor & Eton ; Hampton & Richmond. I mean make up your oxf*rd' minds.
Thames Valley Royals had more integrity.
by Tredder » 26 Aug 2009 14:24
General B You want to get yourselves down to Hampton and Richmond with me.
You can drink during the game, the team aren't bad and they've got one of the most active impaired mobility firms (Beaver Road Bennys) in non-league football.
by Ark Royal » 26 Aug 2009 14:41
Ian Herring In my opinion, none of it is a surprise really, is it? As Foch says, we have the look of a club that is everything that is wrong about modern football today. As soon as Justice Taylor decided to go all-seat, as soon as the old 'big five' got their wishes granted with the formation of the Premiership, as soon as Murdoch and his rapacious pay-tv execs saw a market open up for them, any pretence that a once solid and quite beautiful (I don't care that is was sometime violent or dirty or unpleasant - it was simply FUN) sport would survive as anything less than a Disney-fied and over-exaggerated pantomime of what it once was, was gone.
Going to games now is similar to going to a school fete, or some 'on ice' spectacular with fat provincials in cheap suits or 'slacks' on the mike 'exhorting' crowds with that kind of accent you only ever hear on local radio. It's as cringe-making as attending corporate 'gee-ups' or 'kick-offs' or 'team-building' events with a company. That same, utterly flared, over-hyped and pumped pile of passionless shite you used to go to football to avoid.
Because football - as a fan at least - was about passion, local feeling, identity, and fire in your belly.
I watched a game at my local park the other day. Sunday morning stuff. The football was shite, yes. (But have a look at what is served up for your big tickets these days (Birmingham v Stoke anyone? - empty seats everywhere in a so-called 'traditional' football city in what was supposed to be a local derby) but it was the essence of what some of us once loved. Grass, sky, boots, goals, and everything kept simple. Bit of swearing, the occasional fisticuffs, some searing, off-the-cuff humour.
Not the anodyne, anaesthetised, utterly truly plastic shit the experience is today. I've been going nearly thirty years now. And wouldn't give you a tuppenny toss for what football has become these days for the average fan. It could have all been done better. But of course it wouldn't be. Moneymen and business types don't hover too much over issues such as tradition or the word 'fan'. Spivs and marketeers are spivs and marketeers in whatever trade they're in.
It's become an onanist's sport. A pile of shit. Where maniacs with microphones and PA systems that could disturb the peace on the moon, mental defectives in day-glo orange think they understand crowd dynamics or even human beings, players wear hair bands and male grooming products and writhe around like new-born foals who've trod on a piece of glass, and goal 'celebrations' for the retarded.
As far as I'm concerned, it needs to be folded up and fired straight out of General B's spunk cannon into outer space.
You can poke it.
*cue 'dinosaur' jibes and the hamper-bringer brigade's opprobrium*
by Tony Le Mesmer » 26 Aug 2009 14:48
Ark RoyalIan Herring In my opinion, none of it is a surprise really, is it? As Foch says, we have the look of a club that is everything that is wrong about modern football today. As soon as Justice Taylor decided to go all-seat, as soon as the old 'big five' got their wishes granted with the formation of the Premiership, as soon as Murdoch and his rapacious pay-tv execs saw a market open up for them, any pretence that a once solid and quite beautiful (I don't care that is was sometime violent or dirty or unpleasant - it was simply FUN) sport would survive as anything less than a Disney-fied and over-exaggerated pantomime of what it once was, was gone.
Going to games now is similar to going to a school fete, or some 'on ice' spectacular with fat provincials in cheap suits or 'slacks' on the mike 'exhorting' crowds with that kind of accent you only ever hear on local radio. It's as cringe-making as attending corporate 'gee-ups' or 'kick-offs' or 'team-building' events with a company. That same, utterly flared, over-hyped and pumped pile of passionless shite you used to go to football to avoid.
Because football - as a fan at least - was about passion, local feeling, identity, and fire in your belly.
I watched a game at my local park the other day. Sunday morning stuff. The football was shite, yes. (But have a look at what is served up for your big tickets these days (Birmingham v Stoke anyone? - empty seats everywhere in a so-called 'traditional' football city in what was supposed to be a local derby) but it was the essence of what some of us once loved. Grass, sky, boots, goals, and everything kept simple. Bit of swearing, the occasional fisticuffs, some searing, off-the-cuff humour.
Not the anodyne, anaesthetised, utterly truly plastic shit the experience is today. I've been going nearly thirty years now. And wouldn't give you a tuppenny toss for what football has become these days for the average fan. It could have all been done better. But of course it wouldn't be. Moneymen and business types don't hover too much over issues such as tradition or the word 'fan'. Spivs and marketeers are spivs and marketeers in whatever trade they're in.
It's become an onanist's sport. A pile of shit. Where maniacs with microphones and PA systems that could disturb the peace on the moon, mental defectives in day-glo orange think they understand crowd dynamics or even human beings, players wear hair bands and male grooming products and writhe around like new-born foals who've trod on a piece of glass, and goal 'celebrations' for the retarded.
As far as I'm concerned, it needs to be folded up and fired straight out of General B's spunk cannon into outer space.
You can poke it.
*cue 'dinosaur' jibes and the hamper-bringer brigade's opprobrium*
+Everything. Post of the Year and sums up perfectly the way I feel at the moment.
by winchester_royal » 26 Aug 2009 14:55
by Sarah Star » 26 Aug 2009 15:04
I paid a fair bit more than three pence earlier this month when, back in England for August, I took my Brazilian girlfriend to games at West Ham and Tottenham.
But the point remains. Going to a football match is an excellent activity for visitors, not least because appreciation of the event does not require language skills. She doesn't speak much English (though she can now chant 'Who are you?) but can still enjoy the occasion for itself and also make comparisons with the experience back in Rio.
Many things made an impression on her - the patience of the fans, for example, their perpetual encouragement and reluctance to turn against their own team after a misplaced pass.
But it was the organisational aspects that struck her most - modern, clean, compact stadiums with the fans close to the pitch, numbered seating where the numbering is respected, toilets in excellent condition. All these things combined to create an environment that, unlike Brazil, she found safe and welcoming.
I explained how this is a relatively new development, how a traditional culture of football watching was rapidly replaced following the trauma of Hillsbrough and Bradford and the entry of new money.
There are, of course, dangers in all these changes. Contemporary English football needs its critics, pricking its hype bubble, bemoaning its commercialisation and fearing that excessive prices are excluding the future generation of players and thus jeopardising the soul of the game.
But English football is clearly doing something right. The matches we saw were pre-season friendlies - both with crowds considerably higher than the average in the Brazilian First Division. And the most extraordinary thing is the depth of this popularity.
The same is true of the Championship (for foreign readers, the name used in England to refer to the Second Division) - all Saturday's games attracted crowds over 10,000, with only three below the Brazilian top-flight average of 15,000.
It is powerful evidence for the view that the new money has been attracted in large part because the old culture is so well-entrenched.
I tend to see this in connection with the country's industrial past. In its mass form, British football was the creation of the world's first industrial society, with its sense of community and its labour intensive emphasis on physical strength and reliability.
The domestic game's crisis years were those of the crisis of industrial society and now, in a time of uncertainty and bewildering technological change, football offers an opportunity to get back in contact with the collective values of the industrial age - in this new, safe and sanitized manner which so impressed my girlfriend.
Back in her homeland, a different dynamic is in effect and Sports Minister Orlando Silva is aware that the local game has fallen a long way behind.
"Brazilian football could be better and stronger," he said earlier this month. "There is no pre-occupation in having safe and comfortable stadiums to increase the crowds, or altering the kick-off times to get more people into the stadiums. The problem is that in Brazil the principal source of income is selling players."
The other major source is TV rights, which he touched on obliquely in his complaint about the kick off times - the powerful TV Globo ensures that the big evening matches get underway around 10 at night, after the main soap opera.
This leaves South American football with an awkward question. In a model of administration where, compared with player sales and TV rights, the money paid by the fan at the gate is relatively unimportant, why bother investing in supporter comfort?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/timvickery/2 ... ery_2.html
by Wimb » 26 Aug 2009 15:14
by Ark Royal » 26 Aug 2009 15:15
by Gordons Cumming » 26 Aug 2009 15:23
by Dorset-Knob » 26 Aug 2009 15:37
by Focher » 26 Aug 2009 15:37
by Sir Rodney Effing » 26 Aug 2009 15:41
Focher nice post ark royal, although i will add your name sake, 50035, has now been painted into Load haul livery and has been re numbered 50135. I fuking disgrace if you ask me.
by Focher » 26 Aug 2009 15:44
Sir Rodney EffingFocher nice post ark royal, although i will add your name sake, 50035, has now been painted into Load haul livery and has been re numbered 50135. I fuking disgrace if you ask me.
I thought you said you couldnt be bothered any more yesterday!!!![]()
now I await all the pointless and crap abuse... no point, my boss is watch so Im logging off
by Dorset-Knob » 26 Aug 2009 15:46
by General B » 26 Aug 2009 15:57
Tredder You must hide everytime i come close to emptying my glass, it's got far more attractions than the firm, the bloke from the bill that mans the freebie entrance gate, Paul Merton in his duffel coat and a genuine midget in a beaver outfit.
by Vision » 26 Aug 2009 16:13
by Focher » 26 Aug 2009 16:20
by Dorset-Knob » 26 Aug 2009 16:56
Focher i thought it was Tosh Lines
by FiNeRaIn » 26 Aug 2009 16:57
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 131 guests