by Hoop Blah » 18 Aug 2011 19:29
by Snowball » 18 Aug 2011 20:17
Ian Royal Sadly Intelligent Design and Creationism get lots of support, it doesn't mean they're in anyway valid.
Although of course, plenty that you say is.
by Snowball » 18 Aug 2011 20:18
Hoop Blah It would be iteresting if you compare it to other sides, without that context it won't tell you much.
My gut feeling is that you'll find the majority of goals are scored around half time (more after the whistle than before) and in the last 15/20 minutes of games.
I don't think we do anything special in the first half but the first 15/20 minutes of a game is often tighter because teams are jostling for superiority more than later in games (unless it's a tight game with little in it and neither willing to gamble on the win).
by RobRoyal » 19 Aug 2011 08:44
SnowballIan Royal Sadly Intelligent Design and Creationism get lots of support, it doesn't mean they're in anyway valid.
Although of course, plenty that you say is.
I have NO IDEA if this is a significant stat, and SAID So.
It's merely "one worth watching"
We might go 4-0 up in the first 15 minutes, Saturday.
Even then we might discover that McDermot has two strategies, one for tough games
Millwall-Leicester-Pompey (and virtually all away games) would be that.
and another for (relatively, subjectively) "easy" games
For example, we might expect lowly sides to come to the MadStad and "park the bus"
by Snowball » 19 Aug 2011 09:32
by Z175 » 19 Aug 2011 11:14
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Aug 2011 11:58
Snowball Hey, Einstein, what would be "unquantifiable"
by Snowball » 19 Aug 2011 12:08
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Aug 2011 12:10
Snowball And of course Rob Royal wasn't being sarcastic.
by Snowball » 19 Aug 2011 12:11
Z175 Mr Snowball,
I like stats in general but I don't find this particularly user friendly. Is it possible to make a slightly easier to read table?
I appreciate you have explained in text above how to interpret this table but if its to be a regularly updated post its hard to read it each time.
1 0 0.0 1.0 069 069 069 HRK <<<<<<
2 0 0.0 2.0 158 079 079 Manset
0 1 2.0 2.5 270 999 108 Kebe
1 0 0.0 0.0 248 248 248 Hunt
0 0 1.0 1.0 270 999 270 Harte
0 1 0.0 0.5 270 999 540 McAnuff
0 0 0.5 0.5 180 999 360 Griffin
0 0 0.0 0.0 240 999 999 Karacan
0 0 0.0 0.0 270 999 999 L'wood
0 0 0.0 0.0 270 999 999 Khumalo
0 0 0.5 0.0 270 999 540 Pearce
0 0 0.0 0.0 008 999 999 Howard
0 0 0.0 0.0 180 999 999 Federici
by Snowball » 19 Aug 2011 12:13
Wycombe RoyalSnowball And of course Rob Royal wasn't being sarcastic.
But didn't start calling you names.
As someone of advanced years you do behave very immaturely at times on here just becuase people dare to question your posts.
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Aug 2011 12:15
by Snowball » 19 Aug 2011 12:17
Z175 Mr Snowball,
I like stats in general but I don't find this particularly user friendly. Is it possible to make a slightly easier to read table?
I appreciate you have explained in text above how to interpret this table but if its to be a regularly updated post its hard to read it each time.
1 0 0.0 1.0 069 069 069 HRK
by Z175 » 20 Aug 2011 09:36
by SpaghettiHoop » 20 Aug 2011 10:33
by Snowball » 20 Aug 2011 20:14
Z175 Ah I see. Cheers!
I was confused by the 999s
by Snowball » 20 Aug 2011 20:21
by Snowball » 21 Aug 2011 13:29
by Snowball » 25 Aug 2011 10:54
by Snowball » 25 Aug 2011 11:05
Users browsing this forum: Ascotexgunner, Bristol Paul, Google [Bot], ILoveMoonPig, Lower West, Mid Sussex Royal, Orion1871, st george, Sutekh, windermereROYAL and 202 guests