by cmonurz » 11 Feb 2013 16:50
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Feb 2013 16:51
melonhead there were 3 possible footballers who we identified, played in an area in which we were lacking, we thought we could afford, may be sold, would want to come here, and would most probably fit in wit the group and the ethos.
we failed to bring them in.
its a failure, cos we failed.
but the idea you just keep picking midfielders until one says yes is flawed imo
by melonhead » 11 Feb 2013 17:20
cmonurz If you need a coat, and you go shopping for a coat and find out you don't quite have enough money for the one you wanted, you don't just not buy a coat, and get cold, and get cold AIDS, and die.
You need a coat, so you make damn sure you get one.
by melonhead » 11 Feb 2013 17:20
Extended-Phenotypemelonhead there were 3 possible footballers who we identified, played in an area in which we were lacking, we thought we could afford, may be sold, would want to come here, and would most probably fit in wit the group and the ethos.
we failed to bring them in.
its a failure, cos we failed.
but the idea you just keep picking midfielders until one says yes is flawed imo
Sure, and the football world would agree with you, hence the existence of scouts.
by MartinRdg » 11 Feb 2013 17:32
cmonurz If you need a coat, and you go shopping for a coat and find out you don't quite have enough money for the one you wanted, you don't just not buy a coat, and get cold, and get cold AIDS, and die.
You need a coat, so you make damn sure you get one.
by SPARTA » 11 Feb 2013 17:33
melonheadExtended-Phenotypemelonhead there were 3 possible footballers who we identified, played in an area in which we were lacking, we thought we could afford, may be sold, would want to come here, and would most probably fit in wit the group and the ethos.
we failed to bring them in.
its a failure, cos we failed.
but the idea you just keep picking midfielders until one says yes is flawed imo
Sure, and the football world would agree with you, hence the existence of scouts.
our scouts identified players though.
we tried to get them
by maffff » 11 Feb 2013 18:20
by melonhead » 12 Feb 2013 10:19
SPARTAmelonheadExtended-Phenotype Sure, and the football world would agree with you, hence the existence of scouts.
our scouts identified players though.
we tried to get them
by Extended-Phenotype » 12 Feb 2013 11:36
melonheadExtended-Phenotypemelonhead there were 3 possible footballers who we identified, played in an area in which we were lacking, we thought we could afford, may be sold, would want to come here, and would most probably fit in wit the group and the ethos.
we failed to bring them in.
its a failure, cos we failed.
but the idea you just keep picking midfielders until one says yes is flawed imo
Sure, and the football world would agree with you, hence the existence of scouts.
our scouts identified players though.
we tried to get them
by maffff » 12 Feb 2013 11:53
by floyd__streete » 12 Feb 2013 12:49
comec1871 We are going to need him if we want to stay up he's much better option than leigertwood
by Ian Royal » 12 Feb 2013 12:51
maffff If it works for 'arry...
by floyd__streete » 12 Feb 2013 12:53
Ian Royal Because it seems we went for three during the window and that's not good enough for you. So what's a reasonable number? And how quickly do you expect the club to put together a deal for a back-up player if the ones ahead fall through? Because at the moment it looks like you expect the club to do it in 15 minutes.
by melonhead » 12 Feb 2013 15:14
Extended-PhenotypemelonheadExtended-Phenotype Sure, and the football world would agree with you, hence the existence of scouts.
our scouts identified players though.
we tried to get them
Cos that's my argument isn't it? WHY DIDN'T MCDERMO JUST APPROACH MIDFIELDERS AT RANDOM ONE BY ONE UNTIL ONE SAID YEAH
ANYONE AT ALL. AT RANDOM. JUST SHUT HIS EYES, POINT AND SPIN AROUND FOR 5 SECONDS, STOP AND RUN IN THAT DIRECTION UNTIL YOU COME ACROSS A MIDFIELDER AND SIGN THAT ONE.
YEAH.
by melonhead » 12 Feb 2013 15:15
floyd__streeteIan Royal Because it seems we went for three during the window and that's not good enough for you. So what's a reasonable number? And how quickly do you expect the club to put together a deal for a back-up player if the ones ahead fall through? Because at the moment it looks like you expect the club to do it in 15 minutes.
Because the transfew window is only 1 day long?
by Royal Rother » 12 Feb 2013 15:37
by Royal With Cheese » 12 Feb 2013 16:35
floyd__streetecomec1871 We are going to need him if we want to stay up he's much better option than leigertwood
Fu.
Cking.
Hell.
Since going 4-5-1 Leiegrtwood has been one of our best, most important players.
by Ian Royal » 12 Feb 2013 17:01
floyd__streeteIan Royal Because it seems we went for three during the window and that's not good enough for you. So what's a reasonable number? And how quickly do you expect the club to put together a deal for a back-up player if the ones ahead fall through? Because at the moment it looks like you expect the club to do it in 15 minutes.
Because the transfew window is only 1 day long?
by Extended-Phenotype » 13 Feb 2013 13:02
Ian Royalmaffff If it works for 'arry...
How many players for one position do you expect our scouts to identify that they think'll improve us, fit our club and are at a value we find reasonable E-P?
by melonhead » 13 Feb 2013 15:06
Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 345 guests