Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

Clarke or McDermott?

Clarke
26
36%
McDermott
46
64%
 
Total votes: 72
No Fixed Abode

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by No Fixed Abode » 13 Apr 2016 15:14

Maneki Neko
No Fixed Abode
andrew1957 Under Clarke the team (for whatever reason) was going off a cliff. .


:lol:

Err - they were on a poor run - but off a cliff? Massively exaggerating here..


from 2nd, winning every week, to 13th and winning 1 in 8
I wont insist its an actual cliff, but its certainly cliff-like.


Reading were not 13th when Clarke left. Know your facts. :lol:

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Maneki Neko » 13 Apr 2016 15:26

his team were when brian took over
and id say the further drop is defo something to do with him leaving, so its still his fault after he left
:lol:

User avatar
John Smith
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4727
Joined: 20 Jan 2010 23:47
Location: Astronauts The New Conquistadors

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by John Smith » 13 Apr 2016 15:29

Does Clarke's dire plummet minus our superb patch early season equate to the work McDermott has done so far?

No Fixed Abode

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by No Fixed Abode » 13 Apr 2016 15:32

I suppose at least BM has been consistent. Consistently mediocre. Taking them 1 place further down the table from when he took charge.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26481
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by genome » 13 Apr 2016 15:34

No Fixed Abode
Maneki Neko
No Fixed Abode
:lol:

Err - they were on a poor run - but off a cliff? Massively exaggerating here..


from 2nd, winning every week, to 13th and winning 1 in 8
I wont insist its an actual cliff, but its certainly cliff-like.


Reading were not 13th when Clarke left. Know your facts. :lol:


11th after the full round of games that weekend

But if you want to argue the difference between dropping from 2nd to 11th and 2nd to 13th, be my guest


No Fixed Abode

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by No Fixed Abode » 13 Apr 2016 15:36

11th is better than 14th (currently). Good improvement under BM eh!

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Maneki Neko » 13 Apr 2016 15:37

theyre both cliff like imo

one cliff is just slightly bigger than the other

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26481
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by genome » 13 Apr 2016 15:38

brokenrecord.gif

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Maneki Neko » 13 Apr 2016 15:41

No Fixed Abode 11th is better than 14th (currently). Good improvement under BM eh!


its ok kes. Clarke is alright, hes got over it, so have we. no one hates him, or think hes the worst manager ever, you don't have to keep sticking up for him.


No Fixed Abode

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by No Fixed Abode » 13 Apr 2016 16:14

Maneki Neko
No Fixed Abode 11th is better than 14th (currently). Good improvement under BM eh!


its ok kes. Clarke is alright, hes got over it, so have we. no one hates him, or think hes the worst manager ever, you don't have to keep sticking up for him.


I'll give up if you give up defending BM - who clearly isn't doing a good job.

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Maneki Neko » 13 Apr 2016 16:54

I think, in context, hes doing just fine

No Fixed Abode

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by No Fixed Abode » 13 Apr 2016 17:05

Maneki Neko I think, in context, hes doing just fine


So Sa and Blackman left. But the rest of the squad has had more time to gel and still can't improve under BM.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5012
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Lower West » 13 Apr 2016 17:36

To be fair to Brian he should be the given the summer and the start of next season. Clarke did huge untold damage to the club with the clear out of playing staff and coaches. If anything has put us backwards in terms of transition from the Atkins era. Also Brian's influence will take time to work it's way through the whole club. We cannot compete with the bigger spenders. So need to groom home talent. That progresses seamlessly up through the different age groups. With a distinct style of play.

On reflection Clarke was all words. Detached from the fans. He only ever saw this post as a springboard to better things.


msmivie
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 13 Jun 2015 17:10

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by msmivie » 13 Apr 2016 18:47

SIMPLE STAT
Clarke 21 League matches. 27 points
McDermott. 20 League matches. 24 points

No Fixed Abode

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by No Fixed Abode » 13 Apr 2016 18:48

Lower West
He only ever saw this post as a springboard to better things.


TBF- That's what most of the players do when they sign for Reading unless they're in the latter part of their career.

Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4048
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Mid Sussex Royal » 13 Apr 2016 19:02

Results nothing in it - depends if you treat the 2 games lost under Kuhl as Clarke...

I reckon Clarke became unsettled because of the transfer policy more than anything else which obviously contributed to the poor run.

I am not sure the players signed in the summer are even Clarke's quite honestly; possibly Piazon as he was from Chelsea but the owners have contacts in Portugal/Spain so not convinced the three players from there were following Clarke's recommendation.

User avatar
royalp-we
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2242
Joined: 30 Sep 2010 11:04

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by royalp-we » 13 Apr 2016 19:04

Personally; Clarke.

This 'damage' people keep bleating he did to the club is blown out of proportion by the McDonut lovers; he was raising the profile of the club and got us to Wembley; albeit the league form wasn't superb but I think if he had stayed and not spoken with Fulham, he could have achieved something really great here with his contacts. All Ifs, buts and maybes. But I'd feel a great deal more optimistic if Clarke stayed even if we were 14th as we are. I'm really struggling to take any positives from either our performance or small talk currently being served up.

I'm all for giving BMcD some time; probably till around Oct/Nov. He could get this so called 'Reading way' back in our sails. But football is far more cut throat now and PERFORMANCES is what MUST be delivered. Sooner rather than later. Bringing him back seemed like a 'nice' thing to do. Being nicey-nice with our recruitment will ultimately get us nowhere.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Ian Royal » 13 Apr 2016 20:18

McDermott. Easily.

McDermott's consistently had us around mid-table, picking up points against the teams we have to and working hard under difficult circumstances. Bar the odd game we've looked like a better organised, better unit that cares more, but with some deep flaws.

Under Clarke we looked toothless to start, then looked world beaters for 6 out of 7 games and then looked like relegation favourites for the next 8/9. Not only that but Clarke demonstrated a complete lack of commitment to the project and was instrumental in our bad down turn in form and confidence by consistently playing an unbalanced, lightweight and weak side from about Burnley / Middlesbrough onwards.

It's a disgrace the question is even being asked.

When you add in previous, Clarke has no history that he can point to as his own good managerial appointments and was dire in his first six months with us. Whereas McDermott has achieved a lot on his own.

And regardless of whether Clarke was better or not, he got sacked and is no longer manager. We need to live in the now. We can't afford to become Leeds and sack a manager every six months, and if we do I'll be quitting supporting the club. We need stability and if we can't have good success, I can't think of anyone I'd rather have in charge whilst we struggle.

Dr_Hfuhruhurr
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7179
Joined: 03 Sep 2013 15:56
Location: What are those arseholes doing on the porch?

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Dr_Hfuhruhurr » 13 Apr 2016 22:13

I think Clarke rather stained his time in charge by talking to a rival club to become their manager, and then telling us all it was all OK, because it was his professional duty to do so. Compared to that, losing away to a Northern club on a Tuesday night is all rather tame.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5012
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: Based on This Season ONLY: Clarke or McDermott?

by Lower West » 13 Apr 2016 22:48

No Fixed Abode
Maneki Neko I think, in context, hes doing just fine


So Sa and Blackman left. But the rest of the squad has had more time to gel and still can't improve under BM.


It isn't a computer game where you buy players based on stats. Put on them on the pitch and expect them to play beautifull football. :shock:

This squad isn't right. So so obvious.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], From Despair To Where?, Linden Jones' Tash, Silver Fox, WestYorksRoyal and 279 guests

It is currently 12 Aug 2025 10:51