URZZ Ironic how we're family club of the year so many years, and one of the most offensive clubs. I think not the latter
just proves how farcicle these surveys are.
by larry1971 » 15 Sep 2012 14:54
URZZ Ironic how we're family club of the year so many years, and one of the most offensive clubs. I think not the latter
by ZacNaloen » 15 Sep 2012 15:38
by Turnball ACs » 15 Sep 2012 16:06
by Blakey's Right Peg » 15 Sep 2012 17:08
by grey_squirrel » 15 Sep 2012 19:18
by Optimist » 16 Sep 2012 12:45
Blakey's Right Peg Aside from the obvious clubs, I used to think we were generally held in high regard among a number of neutrals.
Smallish club who mostly try to play the right way and enjoy good success without spending bucket loads of cash.
Apparently I was wrong!
by larry1971 » 16 Sep 2012 13:36
OptimistBlakey's Right Peg Aside from the obvious clubs, I used to think we were generally held in high regard among a number of neutrals.
Smallish club who mostly try to play the right way and enjoy good success without spending bucket loads of cash.
Apparently I was wrong!
We must have done something offensive since our time as "everyone's 2nd team" in 06/07.
by frimmers3 » 16 Sep 2012 19:13
Dick Habbin's hairdo Actually, seems to make some sense, with the exception of our rivalry changing from Swind*n to Aldersh*t. It has been, of course, and always will be those scummers from north Hampshire.
by Royal Dee » 16 Sep 2012 19:47
by frimmers3 » 16 Sep 2012 19:54
by Royal Dee » 16 Sep 2012 20:07
frimmers3 "most" aldershot fans? most aldershot town fans are pleased to have a club that represents the town when it appeared to all and sundry that that premise was one consigned to history.ambition(or lack of) is a valid point.on the plus side,aldershot town are one of the few league clubs that can boast as to never being relegated during their history.
by frimmers3 » 16 Sep 2012 20:12
by SHORT AND CURLY » 16 Sep 2012 20:21
frimmers3 all clubs have a neanderthal sub section of "followers".aldershot included.
by harryroyal » 16 Sep 2012 20:22
St PauliRepressedRoyallarry1971
but I think the rivalry I've always found most curious is that between Crystal Palace and Brighton .
Look at a map, it's closer than you may think.
That and they share the same trains back from London. London away games for both clubs + booze = fighting + rivalry.
Millwall and Pompey must be a hooligan thing both have big firms.
by leicsRoyal » 16 Sep 2012 20:23
SHORT AND CURLYfrimmers3 all clubs have a neanderthal sub section of "followers".aldershot included.
Adershit had around 1900 for a home game yesterday.
Despite my hatred for them in the 70's/80s I actually have pity on them now![]()
Perhaps they should have Farnborough or Basingstoke as their rivals
by frimmers3 » 16 Sep 2012 20:40
by Royal Dee » 01 Nov 2012 10:11
by Alexander Litvinenko » 01 Nov 2012 10:19
by Vision » 01 Nov 2012 10:25
Alexander Litvinenko Because to so many people we appear to be the epitome of middle-class, family-friendly football - and the complete antithesis of what traditional football was all about.
Faceless concrete bowl out of town? - Tick
No pubs near the ground? - Tick
Cringeworthy announcements before the game? - Tick
Image that we got where we are through an owner's money? - Only indirectly, but that's the common perception
Music after goals? - Tick
Stewards killing any atmosphere or spontaneity? - Tick
Use of flags/banner/clappers? - Tick
No history? - Not true, but again that's a common perception as out history is long but modest
Failure to fill our ground when things aren't going well? - Tick
2/3 of the ground make virtually no noise? - Tick
Everything stage-managed and aimed at families? - Tick
Tiebreaker - Name of sponsor? Ah ....
We are undoubtedly the most clear representation of middle-class football in the game today - and people don't like us for it.
by SCIAG » 01 Nov 2012 10:27
Users browsing this forum: Vision and 156 guests