by Terminal Boardom » 09 Aug 2009 18:58
by Ian Royal » 09 Aug 2009 19:02
winchester_royalIan Royal They had the best chance. The one Federici miraculously saved.
Umm....I'd say the open goals that both Kebe and Davies missed were better chances.
by Dirk Gently » 09 Aug 2009 19:13
winchester_royalIan Royal They had the best chance. The one Federici miraculously saved.
Umm....I'd say the open goals that both Kebe and Davies missed were better chances.
by rg6royal » 09 Aug 2009 20:18
by rg6royal » 09 Aug 2009 20:18
by BobKnows » 09 Aug 2009 20:45
by rabidbee » 09 Aug 2009 23:30
by leon » 09 Aug 2009 23:37
rabidbee I'm not saying that I wasn't pleased, given the age and experience of the team, but 8s and 9s were silly. I didn't think we really dominated, both teams had spells of bossing the game, making it fairly even over all. It was a stale-mate because neither team really had much to offer up front.
Still, the kids look promising.
by Dirk Gently » 10 Aug 2009 00:20
by rg6royal » 10 Aug 2009 00:22
leonrabidbee I'm not saying that I wasn't pleased, given the age and experience of the team, but 8s and 9s were silly. I didn't think we really dominated, both teams had spells of bossing the game, making it fairly even over all. It was a stale-mate because neither team really had much to offer up front.
Still, the kids look promising.
on reflection i was overly critical. I think we could potentially pass to death some teams in the league, and with the right front 3 (ie not Kebe who couldnt hit a cows arse with a banjo) we could do some damage this season, we looked a different proposition when Long came on and church went to right side. Also this team really will get better in the next few months,
by Dirk Gently » 10 Aug 2009 00:28
rg6royalleonrabidbee I'm not saying that I wasn't pleased, given the age and experience of the team, but 8s and 9s were silly. I didn't think we really dominated, both teams had spells of bossing the game, making it fairly even over all. It was a stale-mate because neither team really had much to offer up front.
Still, the kids look promising.
on reflection i was overly critical. I think we could potentially pass to death some teams in the league, and with the right front 3 (ie not Kebe who couldnt hit a cows arse with a banjo) we could do some damage this season, we looked a different proposition when Long came on and church went to right side. Also this team really will get better in the next few months,
what has kebe done wrong now?
by rabidbee » 10 Aug 2009 01:52
Dirk Gently Think what a good result on Tuesday and Saturday could do for them - as kids they have no fear anyway, so add increased confidence to that and things could be very interesting.
by Stranded » 10 Aug 2009 07:19
by Alan Partridge » 10 Aug 2009 07:44
by Dirk Gently » 10 Aug 2009 08:03
rabidbeeDirk Gently Think what a good result on Tuesday and Saturday could do for them - as kids they have no fear anyway, so add increased confidence to that and things could be very interesting.
Yep, but the corollory of that is that if they give away possession as easily as they did on saturday against a more dangerous team, we'll get spanked. It's nice to see players want to run the ball out from the edge of our own box, but sometimes they really do need to just spank it up the field. Not too often, certainly not all of the time, just when it's dangerous.
by CMRoyal » 10 Aug 2009 08:51
PieEater Now we've got the hang of the sideways passing game, we just need some better movement, that should change our play from dull and uninspiring, to exciting and incisive.
by CMRoyal » 10 Aug 2009 08:53
ArchCMRoyalrabidbee I read three pages of players being rated at 8 or 9. 6s, I think.
Fair dues, scores do tend to hit extremes here. But that's always been the case. The general consensus seems to be pretty clear though. Pretty, but we need an end product: experienced 15-a-season forward needed pretty urgently.
Maybe we already have one, but he only got 25 minutes yesterday.
by howser » 10 Aug 2009 09:10
by ZacNaloen » 10 Aug 2009 09:23
Alan Partridge Did ok, he's made footballers of Cisse and Pearce which is good darts, Rosenior defensively was good, he tries to bomb forward, some of his passing/crossing was a bit dump but that's why he plays for Reading, Kanu didn't have a particularly good game which was a shame, thought tabb was ineffective, Davies and Karacan were quite good.
It was a so so kind of a performance, still the same problem as last year, it's a new look team dressed up differently but still with the cutting edge of plastic Playschool scissors. He's got to buy a decent centre forward if he's going to play one up front. Promising signs but not enugh in the final 3rd, they will all know that so expect something to happen soon.
by Alan Partridge » 10 Aug 2009 09:24
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], RG30 and 123 guests