Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

209 posts
User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5978
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Extended-Phenotype » 20 Feb 2014 14:50

Pepe the Horseman
Extended-Phenotype
YateleyRoyal This has to be some of the best WUMming i've ever seen.

He is joking, right?


If you've read his shit on other threads, he is either the worlds most bored man putting in a shameful amount of effort playing this bumwipe, or someone who could at least be called consistent.

This has just reminded me I haven't had a poo today :(


I had a poo this morning but it was supposed to have been done yesterday so it was old and incomplete where I had broken it sitting down.

User avatar
Ouroboros
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3691
Joined: 17 Jan 2013 23:40

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Ouroboros » 20 Feb 2014 15:36

Extended-Phenotype Those arguing homosexuality is "unnatural" should think twice before they have sex recreationally ever again.


On the contrary, I'd support them having recreational sex over any other sort.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5978
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Extended-Phenotype » 20 Feb 2014 16:15

Ouroboros
Extended-Phenotype Those arguing homosexuality is "unnatural" should think twice before they have sex recreationally ever again.


On the contrary, I'd support them having recreational sex over any other sort.


I totally see what you did there.

FridaysGhost
Member
Posts: 502
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 20:27

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by FridaysGhost » 25 Feb 2014 21:31

Ian Royal FridaysGhost probably thinks that because they're genetically caused we should cure people of being black or ginger as well.

In fact I think there's some evidence emerging that being liberal may come from a different brain state, which will be influenced by genetics so maybe he's hoping he can cure it so everyone will be as hatefully bigoted as him.


Isn't it funny how educated and well-read people are bigoted, racist and homophobic if they dare to mention the science but, the uneducated, un-well-read or simply dim, are heroes of the Revolution because they are the TRUE bigots!

1/ No animals are 'queer', the act of a dominant Male to mount anything in the near vicinity is completely to do with his need to be dominant. The dominant Male is the one whose genes will fill the next Generation. Animals do things due to basic drives, humans think and know attraction. The fact that prominent homosexuals draw peoples attention to the animal world is simply to do with smoke, mirrors and propaganda. As is the pretence that all famous people from the past, regardless of historical fact, were probably homosexual.

2/ Recent research HAS found a gene which makes homosexuality more likely BUT, as with things like a gene that makes Cancer more likely, it is not the gene alone that makes the problem happen. In terms of homosexuality, hormones are also at work. With gene surgery and hormone treatments it may well be that homosexuality does not exist in 100 years. No people with problems about their sexuality, no third sex, no suicides, no homophobia, how can this be a bad thing?

3/ There is a current problem amongst homosexuals, because they would hate to have to come to terms with the fact that that they have a curable problem. This, to them, seems to write them out of history. This, as with other rubbish should be disregarded. Elton John is famous and well-respected because he is a damn good musician. He is defined by his talent not by his sexuality. Only the prats who define themselves by their sexuality have problems.

User avatar
Handsome Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3326
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 08:21
Location: Practically Rock Paper Scissors Champion of the World

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Handsome Man » 25 Feb 2014 21:50

FridaysGhost Isn't it funny how educated and well-read people are bigoted, racist and homophobic if they dare to mention the science but, the uneducated, un-well-read or simply dim, are heroes of the Revolution because they are the TRUE bigots!


I quite like this. It is like you are from an alien civilisation who has studied the English language from a distance and managed to put together some of our words into something like sentences without making any sense whatsoever.

Educated people know when to use capital letters.


FridaysGhost
Member
Posts: 502
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 20:27

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by FridaysGhost » 25 Feb 2014 21:57

Handsome Man
FridaysGhost Isn't it funny how educated and well-read people are bigoted, racist and homophobic if they dare to mention the science but, the uneducated, un-well-read or simply dim, are heroes of the Revolution because they are the TRUE bigots!


I quite like this. It is like you are from an alien civilisation who has studied the English language from a distance and managed to put together some of our words into something like sentences without making any sense whatsoever.

Educated people know when to use capital letters.


Do they? Are they also incapable of answering the questions and statements in the posts that they read - or can they only reply by being abusive to the poster?

Too much of this site is taken up by drongos who cannot refute what has been said and simply Troll the writer instead!

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7395
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Royal Ginger » 25 Feb 2014 21:59


Stop feeding the troll.

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13975
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Archie Gemmill!!!

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by LUX » 25 Feb 2014 22:00

FG, how old are you, what political party do you most identify with, what is your job, where have you been all these HNA years?

Feel free to pm if shy.

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 19020
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Pepe the Horseman » 25 Feb 2014 22:01

FridaysGhost
Handsome Man
FridaysGhost Isn't it funny how educated and well-read people are bigoted, racist and homophobic if they dare to mention the science but, the uneducated, un-well-read or simply dim, are heroes of the Revolution because they are the TRUE bigots!


I quite like this. It is like you are from an alien civilisation who has studied the English language from a distance and managed to put together some of our words into something like sentences without making any sense whatsoever.

Educated people know when to use capital letters.


Do they? Are they also incapable of answering the questions and statements in the posts that they read - or can they only reply by being abusive to the poster?

Too much of this site is taken up by drongos who cannot refute what has been said and simply Troll the writer instead!

Wait, are you Australian?


User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25954
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by From Despair To Where? » 25 Feb 2014 22:04

FridaysGhost
Ian Royal FridaysGhost probably thinks that because they're genetically caused we should cure people of being black or ginger as well.

In fact I think there's some evidence emerging that being liberal may come from a different brain state, which will be influenced by genetics so maybe he's hoping he can cure it so everyone will be as hatefully bigoted as him.


Isn't it funny how educated and well-read people are bigoted, racist and homophobic if they dare to mention the science but, the uneducated, un-well-read or simply dim, are heroes of the Revolution because they are the TRUE bigots!

1/ No animals are 'queer', the act of a dominant Male to mount anything in the near vicinity is completely to do with his need to be dominant. The dominant Male is the one whose genes will fill the next Generation. Animals do things due to basic drives, humans think and know attraction. The fact that prominent homosexuals draw peoples attention to the animal world is simply to do with smoke, mirrors and propaganda. As is the pretence that all famous people from the past, regardless of historical fact, were probably homosexual.

2/ Recent research HAS found a gene which makes homosexuality more likely BUT, as with things like a gene that makes Cancer more likely, it is not the gene alone that makes the problem happen. In terms of homosexuality, hormones are also at work. With gene surgery and hormone treatments it may well be that homosexuality does not exist in 100 years. No people with problems about their sexuality, no third sex, no suicides, no homophobia, how can this be a bad thing?

3/ There is a current problem amongst homosexuals, because they would hate to have to come to terms with the fact that that they have a curable problem. This, to them, seems to write them out of history. This, as with other rubbish should be disregarded. Elton John is famous and well-respected because he is a damn good musician. He is defined by his talent not by his sexuality. Only the prats who define themselves by their sexuality have problems.


All well and good but how does this square up with admiring black men's genitalia in the shower?

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13975
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Archie Gemmill!!!

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by LUX » 26 Feb 2014 08:48

LUX FG, how old are you, what political party do you most identify with, what is your job, where have you been all these HNA years?

Feel free to pm if shy.



ok, you've (oh so surprisingly) come out as Tory/UKIP on AE.

prolly a troll(y) mind.

User avatar
MouldyRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1895
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 16:19
Location: 54-46 that's my number

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by MouldyRoyal » 26 Feb 2014 10:34

It's just Ideal's new gimmick isn't it?

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5978
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Extended-Phenotype » 26 Feb 2014 10:59

FridaysGhost
Ian Royal FridaysGhost probably thinks that because they're genetically caused we should cure people of being black or ginger as well.

In fact I think there's some evidence emerging that being liberal may come from a different brain state, which will be influenced by genetics so maybe he's hoping he can cure it so everyone will be as hatefully bigoted as him.


Isn't it funny how educated and well-read people are bigoted, racist and homophobic if they dare to mention the science but, the uneducated, un-well-read or simply dim, are heroes of the Revolution because they are the TRUE bigots!

1/ No animals are 'queer', the act of a dominant Male to mount anything in the near vicinity is completely to do with his need to be dominant. The dominant Male is the one whose genes will fill the next Generation. Animals do things due to basic drives, humans think and know attraction. The fact that prominent homosexuals draw peoples attention to the animal world is simply to do with smoke, mirrors and propaganda. As is the pretence that all famous people from the past, regardless of historical fact, were probably homosexual.

2/ Recent research HAS found a gene which makes homosexuality more likely BUT, as with things like a gene that makes Cancer more likely, it is not the gene alone that makes the problem happen. In terms of homosexuality, hormones are also at work. With gene surgery and hormone treatments it may well be that homosexuality does not exist in 100 years. No people with problems about their sexuality, no third sex, no suicides, no homophobia, how can this be a bad thing?

3/ There is a current problem amongst homosexuals, because they would hate to have to come to terms with the fact that that they have a curable problem. This, to them, seems to write them out of history. This, as with other rubbish should be disregarded. Elton John is famous and well-respected because he is a damn good musician. He is defined by his talent not by his sexuality. Only the prats who define themselves by their sexuality have problems.



1/ They are, it's a well documented and observable phenomenon and a functioning practice within 1500 species.

2/ As with anything hormones and nurture will play some part. But it's only a 'problem' because people like you make it one. Why does it bother you what two consenting adults do?

3/ People have a problem with homosexuality being labelled 'curable' because it suggests their sexual preference is a disease. Would you be happy in GayWorld* if people labelled your sexuality an illness and tried to forcibly cure it? If people are suffering as part of a minority, it's pretty disturbing to suggest the solution is to wipe out that minority.



*Everyone is happy in GayWorld


User avatar
Ouroboros
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3691
Joined: 17 Jan 2013 23:40

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Ouroboros » 26 Feb 2014 11:03

FridaysGhost un-well-read


Oh FridaysGhost, you are so eloquent!

<swoon>

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Platypuss » 26 Feb 2014 11:49

FridaysGhost 1/ No animals are 'queer', the act of a dominant Male to mount anything in the near vicinity is completely to do with his need to be dominant. The dominant Male is the one whose genes will fill the next Generation. Animals do things due to basic drives, humans think and know attraction. The fact that prominent homosexuals draw peoples attention to the animal world is simply to do with smoke, mirrors and propaganda.


These lady bonobos sure seem to be "attracted" to one another.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5zOlPsO6U4

FridaysGhost
Member
Posts: 502
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 20:27

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by FridaysGhost » 26 Feb 2014 20:10

To Extended-Phenotit. To totally expand on all of the three points, so that the purposely-blind or simply-refusenik could not muddy the waters, would have taken pages. In animals, whose only basic urges are re-creation or finding food, the seeming act of sexual activity serves a purpose and the activity is genetically programmed to occur. In one-sex groups, or even amongst same-sex siblings, the animals practice and, in the case of Males, show dominance. To pretend that these animals are looking at other animals of the same sex and saying 'I could reproduce but I think I prefer my own sex instead' is so bizarre as to make one wonder what sort of moron could even think that!

In terms of Homosexuality being potentially avoided by the right use of genetics and hormones, this will potentially cure a problem. Future children will never suffer from problems that were not their fault at all!

Thirdly, no human being should ever define themselves by their sexuality. It is talent, hard work, creativity, decency, humility and sense that define a person (whatever their sexuality) and I've probably left out a few. Question:- Did Elton John become famous because he was homosexual or was it because, regardless of his sexuality, he happened to be a damn good musician, songwriter and performer? I rather think it is the second.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Ian Royal » 26 Feb 2014 20:21

Someone clearly knows nothing about Bonobos.

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by Nameless » 26 Feb 2014 20:28

Why are you telling people how they should define themselves ? If Elton John wishes to be partly defined by his sexuality then why not ? Plenty of heterosexual people are heavily identified by their sexuality....

And zas for Elton John being a damn fine musician, I saw him play at the Mad Stad and he was utterly tedious. He also made no gay references at any point during the concert.

User avatar
philM
Member
Posts: 891
Joined: 23 Sep 2006 21:08
Location: Ruscombe

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by philM » 26 Feb 2014 20:38

FG, you keep referring to homosexuality as a problem. Why is it a problem for you?

User avatar
philM
Member
Posts: 891
Joined: 23 Sep 2006 21:08
Location: Ruscombe

Re: Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

by philM » 26 Feb 2014 20:48

Also, you are showing a lot of ignorance about animals. I suggest you do some research. It's not all about food and procreation.

Animals like having fun too.

From Wikipedia..

Animal sexual behaviour takes many different forms, even within the same species. Among animals, researchers have observed monogamy, promiscuity, sex between species, sexual arousal from objects or places, sex apparently via duress or coercion, copulation with dead animals, homosexual sexual behaviour, heterosexual, bisexual sexual behaviour, situational sexual behaviour, and a range of other practices.

And male and female Dolphins regularly give themselves a fin job.

209 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Orion1871, rabidbee, Vision and 441 guests

It is currently 19 Jul 2025 13:28