The Snowball stat thread

2245 posts
User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Ian Royal » 06 Mar 2012 12:31

Hoop Blah
Snowball
Hoop Blah I've not really popped into this thread for a couple of months, but seriously snowball, what do you expect people to do on a forum like this?

It's here for debate and exchanging opinions, if you can't take people passing comment on what you post I do think you could be in the wrong place. If all you want to do is put up your stats for information and the self gratification of endless stats to your liking I think you might be better off create a blog where you can moderate or block the comments to your hearts content.

There's some odd people out there, and the internet is full of strange characters, but sometimes you're online persona and behaviour does actually worry me!



Hoop it's not about "passing comment" and except for a sensible few, it never has been.

It's a concerted attack from a couple of dozen people working in relays.

Nobody's posts could stand up to the minute scrutiny mine get, day upon grinding day.

It started with the first thread I started, supporting Shane Long, and has gone on ever since.



However, in the case of these stats, stats I've said ain't going to be changed
simply because I'm being bullied, stats that some people actually LIKE and
would wish that the nay-sayers just back away... in the case of these, why,
KNOWING my position (which will not change) do people keep coming back
ant ranting about exactly the same things?

All it does is cause noise and heat and spoils the thread for those
who actually want to read the stats.


Anyone and everyone can post their own stats,

Anyone and everyone can go look at stats on the internet.

There isn't much point in repeating internet stats.

This is MY take.

You know, I know, they are my own stats, like them or lump them. You have chosen
to ignore them, good for you... so why EXACTLY do people like Maguire return day after
day just to challenge SOMETHING, knowing that nothing will be changed?

Why? Because they want conflict. They want trouble.


Anyone who genuinely cared could chat by PM. Attacking these stats is just faux-cojones and "easy-meat"
because most attackers have a nice large clique to back them up when they get tired. I'm in a corner
of one, so of course it seems I'm scrapping and retaliating with a similar offensiveness

If 20 people post two offensive posts and I reply then each of those has "only" posted a couple
of antagonists posts and they can write it off as a joke. However, I have received FORTY, and that's
how it is day after day after day.


Your style, almost from day one, has been to ram your stats down the boards collective throat, spamming the board in many ways, and being abusive to anyone who dared to question your stats or their application.

No doubt some have reacted more strongly than others but you're by no means an innocent in the exchanges that you're posting has instigated.

I don't think I've ever been abusive to you or done anything more than challenge your stats and the application of them. Quite often I agree with your opinions and say so but that doesn't stop me from being on the end of some pretty childish replies from yourself.

If you don't want your stats discussed then don't put them on a discussion board. If you don't want to answer the criticisms then don't, those that warm to your stats will understand but will hopefully also see where they are flawed. That's where I think your inaccuracies or odd applications do need to be challenged because often they're misleading and plenty on here seem to need a bit of help seeing where they're weaknesses lie.

I think the fact that there's been 3 or 4 pages, largely of dross and pettiness, since I last posted on here before leaving work yesterday afternoon, is a great example of how your style and spamming has impacted the board and threads you get involved in.

It's a shame because you've got some interesting views when you're willing to enter into a proper discussion, but you're argumentative style and inability to accept critcism hides them for the most part.

As for being bullied and attacked, apart from Ian (who can be very petty himself) the majority of the posters who've engaged with you are actually quite fair minded posters. That you've created arguements out of nothing with the likes of Dirk, Vision and comonurz says quite a lot too.

It's a fair cop Gov. I have tried and also apologised though.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Team Stats

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 12:31

Bringing it Back to Football




Overall Contribution

2,880 Minutes Played 90 Pts 32.00 Mins/Point Pearce
2,880 Minutes Played 85 Pts 33.88 Mins/Point Federici
2,285 Minutes Played 78 Pts 29.29 Mins/Point McAnuff
1,895 Minutes Played 77 Pts 24.61 Mins/Point Kebe
2,519 Minutes Played 75 Pts 33.59 Mins/Point Gorkss
2,608 Minutes Played 74 Pts 35.24 Mins/Point Leigertwood
1,435 Minutes Played 69 Pts 20.80 Mins/Point Harte
2,296 Minutes Played 67 Pts 34.27 Mins/Point Karacan
1,559 Minutes Played 65 Pts 23.98 Mins/Point Le Fondre
1,964 Minutes Played 60 Pts 32.73 Mins/Point Cummings
1,850 Minutes Played 49 Pts 37.76 Mins/Point Hunt
1,496 Minutes Played 46 Pts 32.52 Mins/Point Church
1,357 Minutes Played 37 Pts 36.68 Mins/Point HRK
0,424 Minutes Played 30 Pts 14.13 Mins/Point Roberts
1,198 Minutes Played 30 Pts 39.93 Mins/Point Mills
0,360 Minutes Played 25 Pts 14.40 Mins/Point Connolly
0,745 Minutes Played 25 Pts 29.80 Mins/Point Griffin
0,879 Minutes Played 24 Pts 36.63 Mins/Point Tabb
0,446 Minutes Played 20 Pts 22.30 Mins/Point Manset



Points per Minute Played

0,424 Minutes Played 30 Pts - 14.13 Mins/Point Roberts
0,360 Minutes Played 25 Pts - 14.40 Mins/Point Connolly

1,435 Minutes Played 69 Pts - 20.80 Mins/Point Harte
0,446 Minutes Played 20 Pts - 22.30 Mins/Point Manset
1,559 Minutes Played 65 Pts - 23.98 Mins/Point Le Fondre
1,895 Minutes Played 77 Pts - 24.61 Mins/Point Kebe

2,285 Minutes Played 78 Pts - 29.29 Mins/Point McAnuff
0,745 Minutes Played 25 Pts - 29.80 Mins/Point Griffin

2,880 Minutes Played 90 Pts - 32.00 Mins/Point Pearce
1,496 Minutes Played 46 Pts - 32.52 Mins/Point Church
1,964 Minutes Played 60 Pts - 32.73 Mins/Point Cummings
2,519 Minutes Played 75 Pts - 33.59 Mins/Point Gorkss
2,880 Minutes Played 85 Pts - 33.88 Mins/Point Federici
2,296 Minutes Played 67 Pts - 34.27 Mins/Point Karacan
2,608 Minutes Played 74 Pts - 35.24 Mins/Point Leigertwood
0,879 Minutes Played 24 Pts - 36.63 Mins/Point Tabb
1,357 Minutes Played 37 Pts - 36.68 Mins/Point HRK
1,850 Minutes Played 49 Pts - 37.76 Mins/Point Hunt
1,198 Minutes Played 30 Pts - 39.93 Mins/Point Mills
Last edited by Snowball on 06 Mar 2012 12:33, edited 1 time in total.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 12:32

01 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Ian Royal...

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 12:36

Bringing it Back to Football

Previous post did not include Millwall


Updated

0,514 Minutes Played 35 Pts 14.69 Mins/Point Roberts
0,405 Minutes Played 25 Pts 16.20 Mins/Point Connolly
1,525 Minutes Played 69 Pts 22.10 Mins/Point Harte

1,579 Minutes Played 70 Pts 22.56 Mins/Point Le Fondre
1,895 Minutes Played 77 Pts 24.61 Mins/Point Kebe
0,745 Minutes Played 25 Pts 29.80 Mins/Point Griffin
1,447 Minutes Played 47 Pts 30.79 Mins/Point HRK
1,496 Minutes Played 46 Pts 32.52 Mins/Point Church
2,375 Minutes Played 73 Pts 32.53 Mins/Point McAnuff
1,964 Minutes Played 60 Pts 32.73 Mins/Point Cummings
2,970 Minutes Played 90 Pts 33.00 Mins/Point Pearce
2,609 Minutes Played 75 Pts 34.79 Mins/Point Gorkss
2,970 Minutes Played 85 Pts 34.94 Mins/Point Federici
2,386 Minutes Played 67 Pts 35.61 Mins/Point Karacan
0,924 Minutes Played 24 Pts 38.50 Mins/Point Tabb
2,698 Minutes Played 69 Pts 39.10 Mins/Point Leigertwood
1,920 Minutes Played 49 Pts 39.18 Mins/Point Hunt
1,198 Minutes Played 30 Pts 39.93 Mins/Point Mills


0,446 Minutes Played 20 Pts 22.30 Mins/Point Manset

User avatar
floyd__streete
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8326
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by floyd__streete » 06 Mar 2012 12:37

Snowball 01 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Ian Royal...


Is this your hitlist of people you are going to have executed?


Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 12:38

02 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Ian Royal...

User avatar
floyd__streete
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8326
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by floyd__streete » 06 Mar 2012 12:39

Snowball 02 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Ian Royal...


top of the league
I'm 'avin' a larf.....

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 12:42

03 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Ian Royal...

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Ian Royal » 06 Mar 2012 12:44

Are you all spacktarded moronoids with no memory?

TB's question is the easiest to answer in the world!! We've barely spent any time in tier 2 in the grand scheme of things, so bar one or two seasons we may have had pre-94 it's peezy.

Best winning runs in Tier 2:
10 consecutive wins - 2005/06 - 1st
8 consecutive wins - 2010/11 - 5th
6 consecutive wins - 2002/03 - 4th
6 consecutive wins and counting - 2011/12 - ?

I doubt we've done better in any of our lower than 7th seasons at this level and I can't go back further than 94/95 on here, but that should do you for now. All League only btw...


User avatar
floyd__streete
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8326
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by floyd__streete » 06 Mar 2012 12:48

Snowball 03 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Ian Royal...


This is a train crash of a thread.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Ian Royal » 06 Mar 2012 12:51

floyd__streete
Snowball 03 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Ian Royal...


This is a train crash of a thread.


I'm confused, I can only presume this is some sort of abuse count he's just started. But seeing as my only contribution for the last 5 pages has been to speak to Hoop about how he's got me nailed pretty well and say I've apologised to snowball several times, then add a load of stats which is presumably what the purpose of the thread is... I'm not sure why I'm on it.

I'm not even sure I said anything particularly rude to him yesterday...
Last edited by Ian Royal on 06 Mar 2012 12:51, edited 1 time in total.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 12:51

Bringing it Back to Football

This from a site Ian Royal kindly posted up


Average Time of First Goal (for)

I'm amazed to see we are still averaging the hour!

34 West Ham
39 Cardiff
41 Barnsley
43 Leicester
43 Midd'sbro
45 Southmptn

46 C Palace
46 Birminghm
47 Ipswich
48 Burnley
51 Peterboro
52 Hull City
52 Watford
53 Derby Co
54 Doncaster
54 Leeds Utd
56 Brighton
56 Portsm'th
57 Bristol C
57 Millwall
57 Blackpool
60 Reading <<<<<<<
60 Coventry
61 Forest

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 12:52

04 Floyd...
02 Ian Royal...
01 Wycombe Royal...


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Ian Royal » 06 Mar 2012 12:54

Well it's definitely not abuse... off topic maybe? Which is a bit strange given the last 5 pages.

It would be easier to understand if it was explained snowball.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 13:01

Bringing it Back to Football


Either we have the most heroic squad in history
or McDermott is an absolute genius

We are third, right? Third in the table with a GiH on top?

We have only been in front for 350 minutes this season out of 2,970 (not including extra time)

That is the second-lowest in this league.

That is totally remarkable.


Minutes in the Lead

1,158 West Ham 39%

944 Southmptn
821 Barnsley
814 Burnley
762 Cardiff
711 Leicester
687 Midd'sbro
669 Ipswich
651 Brighton
649 Derby Co
632 C Palace
625 Birminghm
621 Leeds Utd
612 Watford
605 Hull City
580 Peterboro
537 Blackpool
476 Millwall
439 Bristol C
376 Portsm'th
374 Coventry
362 Doncaster
350 Reading 11.8% of the time <<<<<<<<<<<<
326 Forest

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 13:01

04 Floyd...
03 Ian Royal...
01 Wycombe Royal...

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Ian Royal » 06 Mar 2012 13:04

Off topic post score 04 Floyd...
04 Ian Royal...
01 Wycombe Royal...
07 Snowball
03 cmonurz
01 Badger Finger
01 Spirit of Elm Park
01 Maguire
01 Platypus
01 Forbury Lion


Don't worry I added another one to myself for this post... doesn't seem fair not including you, when you keep going off topic to tally the scores. :P

Edit: This is actually quite fun, I can see why snowball is doing it... I have found a flaw though, I can just keep editing my post and stay on 4 points whilst everyone else keeps wracking them up. One per page for me! :lol:

Edit x 2: Tee hee hee.
Last edited by Ian Royal on 06 Mar 2012 13:43, edited 3 times in total.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 13:06

04 Floyd...
04 Ian Royal...
01 Wycombe Royal...

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20786
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Snowball » 06 Mar 2012 13:08

Since I am actually trying to steer the thread back to FOOTBALL

I don't consider a ticker-tape indicating off-topic posts,
trolls etc (otherwise without comment) being off-topic.

No "abuse" from me, just a count.

And I have explained myself once, which is enough.

User avatar
Badger Finger
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1784
Joined: 02 May 2004 18:10
Location: Int'it besseh

Re: The Snowball stat thread

by Badger Finger » 06 Mar 2012 13:09

83.8% chance that a picture of a giraffe on a toilet door means nothing...

2245 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 72 bus, Carlos, Getthebeerens, rabidbee, tidus_mi2, West F and 412 guests

It is currently 16 Aug 2025 22:15