by loyalroyal4life » 02 Mar 2014 16:19
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 02 Mar 2014 16:37
loyalroyal4life wrote: NA is tactically clueless, he does not seem to have an actual plan of action.
by RoyalBlue » 02 Mar 2014 17:28
P!ssed Offsandman FFS stop pinning everything on Madejski.
Yeah, I've just had to block this RoyalBlue snooze fest.
So tedious: "Madejski this, Madejski that".
by stealthpapes » 02 Mar 2014 17:33
by sandman » 02 Mar 2014 18:04
stealthpapes Honestly not enjoyed a game as much in yonks. Sure the result was gash-awful but three deserved reds, a missed penalty, a comedy OG and all sorts of nonsense made it pretty hilarious.
I'm not going into the whys and hows of not looking shite against 8 men but one thing stood out. #15, Duffy, was playing as a sweeper when we had a three man advantage. Absolute motm performance from him but surely the trick would have to spot this and dragged him all over the place. Gorkss off was a mistake, he was attacking crosses more than our strikers, and Blackmailed was an absolute nonentity.
We're so not going up this year, pray for more games like that and the angry, angry kid in front of me. "Ref, you're racist""Send them all off, ref" ... To which a voice from behind him replied "we still wouldn't score, mate".
by wingnut » 02 Mar 2014 18:34
super darren caskey If Adkins don't start Drenthe next game then he need's sacking
by paultheroyal » 02 Mar 2014 20:06
RoyalBlueP!ssed Offsandman FFS stop pinning everything on Madejski.
Yeah, I've just had to block this RoyalBlue snooze fest.
So tedious: "Madejski this, Madejski that".
Do I give a f*ck?
Up until the time that the TSI shit hit the fan, 'Madejski this, Madejski that' was the very frequent promotional cry of the self-publicist Madejski and his merry band of followers.
Coward's way out using the block facility. Can't understand those who seem to lack the ability either to respond to things they don't like or simply just ignore it.
So here is a challenge to those who think I am so wrong to lay the blame at the Madejski's door. It is a challenge that he has shied away from so far. Sadly the journalist who conducted that particular interview has also failed to push the issue.
Care to explain why he gave such a categoric assurance of transfer funding in the last window and then failed to provide a single penny?
Was he pledging someone else's money? If so, then he would appear to have learned very little from the TSI mess. If he was pledging his own money then why did he then fail to put his money where his mouth was?
by CountryRoyal » 02 Mar 2014 20:25
by Ian Royal » 02 Mar 2014 20:40
by windermere_royal » 02 Mar 2014 20:46
CountryRoyal 3 defeats in a row, at home, to supposed "inferior" teams, is simply not good enough.
by sandman » 02 Mar 2014 20:58
by CountryRoyal » 02 Mar 2014 21:04
windermere_royalCountryRoyal 3 defeats in a row, at home, to supposed "inferior" teams, is simply not good enough.
Christ and there was me thinking we drew yesterday, what do I know???
by CountryRoyal » 02 Mar 2014 21:17
Ian Royal You can use this match as a pretty good guide for who has a clue on this site. Just instantly discount anyone who says "we couldn't beat a side with 8 men".
They are after all, it seems, incapable of putting any thought in to realise Yeovil had 8 men for no more than 10 minutes, almost all of which was added time. Or that Yeovil started the match defensively and then went all out defence from the moment they got a player sent off, to the point they were playing 7-0-0 by the end of the match.
The reason they went down to 8 is because on the few occasions we did pull them out and looked to get through them, they scythed us down. So it was either force our way through a packed box with time running out or get fouled and force our way through a packed box.
We could certainly have done a better job. Particularly in the abysmal first half. But it just shows a complete inability to analyse beyond the most basic game headline.
by P!ssed Off » 02 Mar 2014 21:24
sandman Stop trying to act superior to people Ian.
10 minutes should be enough time for any competent team, never mind one chasing the play offs, to beat the bottom of the table side playing with significant reduction of players on the pitch. An excuse of we ran out of time or they defended for their lives really is just that, an excuse.
by Will95 » 02 Mar 2014 21:31
by Readars » 03 Mar 2014 10:27
by super darren caskey » 03 Mar 2014 10:51
wingnutsuper darren caskey If Adkins don't start Drenthe next game then he need's sacking
Oh come on. Royston was clearly knackered after 10 minutes. There's no way he'd last a full game
by paddy20 » 03 Mar 2014 10:51
Readars What gets me is Adkins and the players comments on BBC Radio Berkshire after the game.
“The lads are doing really well in training” “We had some great training sessions this week” “Training is going really well and we hope we can keep up this form”
FFS we are not interested in the FCKING training just say for once “We are absolute crap at the moment, the gaffer hasn’t a clue and nor do we.”
BBC Radio Berkshire please stop interviewing this bunch of clowns who follow the party line and talk a load of bull.
These players over performed for most of Brians tenure and are under performing with Adkins.
Rant over.
by paddy20 » 03 Mar 2014 10:52
super darren caskeywingnutsuper darren caskey If Adkins don't start Drenthe next game then he need's sacking
Oh come on. Royston was clearly knackered after 10 minutes. There's no way he'd last a full game
Of course he would
He's a 26 year old professional footballer
by Royal Ginger » 03 Mar 2014 10:55
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 172 guests