by Ian Royal » 18 Sep 2009 22:04
by ZacNaloen » 18 Sep 2009 22:06
by Terminal Boardom » 18 Sep 2009 22:11
by sandman » 18 Sep 2009 22:12
ZacNaloen And still very disingenuous to call them Coppells players.
He had no hand in their development and they were offered to him on platter at a very low risk value due to where they came from.
They are the academys players, the end.
by roberto_11 » 18 Sep 2009 22:36
Ian Royal He has my conditional and temporary support.
by Ian Royal » 18 Sep 2009 23:38
roberto_11Ian Royal He has my conditional and temporary support.
grow up
by JezD » 19 Sep 2009 00:22
by leon » 19 Sep 2009 00:32
JezD I have faith in BR. I like his style of play and to be honest, I rate his signings. I know I'll get slated for this but he's gonna do us well. Howard is quality, as is O'Dea. The others are looking alright and once they've all blended we'll start winning. People expected too much too fast and don't take into consideration that building a new team doesn't just work instantly. Man Utd's transition from the treble winning team to their current squad didn't just happen, they dropped form for a few seasons but now look at them now. Whilst we are completely different standard to Utd, it just shows transition takes time..
by Royalee » 19 Sep 2009 01:00
Ian Royal I say again, given professional contracts under Coppell. Effectively Coppell's signings.
Educated by Rodgers and Dolan pretty equally.
by Royalee » 19 Sep 2009 01:01
by Ian Royal » 19 Sep 2009 01:01
RoyaleeIan Royal I say again, given professional contracts under Coppell. Effectively Coppell's signings.
Educated by Rodgers and Dolan pretty equally.
Absolute bollocks.
by Royalee » 19 Sep 2009 01:05
by Ian Royal » 19 Sep 2009 01:13
Royalee You show your complete lack of knowledge here - Coppell admitted himself he harshly dropped the likes of Karacan and Pearce last season and both (along with other academy players coming through) have come out and said that they are delighted Rodgers is back as he was the man who brought them to the club and under whom they improved the most.
I look forward to some more well-informed opinions from you based on the radio feed tomorrow though Ian.
by leon » 19 Sep 2009 01:20
Ian RoyalRoyalee You show your complete lack of knowledge here - Coppell admitted himself he harshly dropped the likes of Karacan and Pearce last season and both (along with other academy players coming through) have come out and said that they are delighted Rodgers is back as he was the man who brought them to the club and under whom they improved the most.
I look forward to some more well-informed opinions from you based on the radio feed tomorrow though Ian.
What has that got to do with them signing professional contracts under Coppell (except Davies)? I've never argued Coppell wasn't harsh when he dropped Karacan, Pearce (& Fed). I've only ever said that it was an understandable, but difficult decision. Proved wrong by hindsight.
Did they, or did they not do what I've said? Did 6 of the 10 play under Coppell last season or not? Which would mean most of them DID play under him. Was at least one of 4 who didn't, incontestably signed by Coppell or not?
Simple yes or no questions.
Shed loads of players have gone into our Academy. Only some have been kept. The ones that are kept, are kept because the Manager rated them enough to sign them up to the club professionally.
by The whole year inn » 19 Sep 2009 01:24
leonIan RoyalRoyalee You show your complete lack of knowledge here - Coppell admitted himself he harshly dropped the likes of Karacan and Pearce last season and both (along with other academy players coming through) have come out and said that they are delighted Rodgers is back as he was the man who brought them to the club and under whom they improved the most.
I look forward to some more well-informed opinions from you based on the radio feed tomorrow though Ian.
What has that got to do with them signing professional contracts under Coppell (except Davies)? I've never argued Coppell wasn't harsh when he dropped Karacan, Pearce (& Fed). I've only ever said that it was an understandable, but difficult decision. Proved wrong by hindsight.
Did they, or did they not do what I've said? Did 6 of the 10 play under Coppell last season or not? Which would mean most of them DID play under him. Was at least one of 4 who didn't, incontestably signed by Coppell or not?
Simple yes or no questions.
Shed loads of players have gone into our Academy. Only some have been kept. The ones that are kept, are kept because the Manager rated them enough to sign them up to the club professionally.
Ian - You have to remember with Royalee, RFC History started when Coppell left Reading- apart from all the sh*t stuff. That's was and is Coppell's fault.
by Basingstoke Royal » 19 Sep 2009 09:55
Idealsandman Rodgers..despite supposedly limited resources.
well now, were the resources really that limited? As far as I can tell he's spent about £3M in the transfer market.
Perhaps he could have spent that money a bit more wisely, and the resources wouldn't have appeared so limited..
Basicly all he has to show for it is three players. None of them seem to be all that good.
Let us not forget he also had the possibility to spend another £1.8 million, but failed with that transfer.
So really, he has had £5M available to him, but has failed in the transfer market.
by Royal Lady » 19 Sep 2009 10:02
by ZacNaloen » 19 Sep 2009 10:56
Royal Lady But no-one knows what resources were available last season. I, personally, don't think he will be successful at Reading. I think he'll end up back at Chelsea on the coaching staff or as a moderately successful Div1 or Div 2 manager. I'm more than happy to be proved wrong however!
by sandman » 19 Sep 2009 17:21
Idealsandman Rodgers..despite supposedly limited resources.
well now, were the resources really that limited? As far as I can tell he's spent about £3M in the transfer market.
Perhaps he could have spent that money a bit more wisely, and the resources wouldn't have appeared so limited..
Basicly all he has to show for it is three players. None of them seem to be all that good.
Let us not forget he also had the possibility to spend another £1.8 million, but failed with that transfer.
So really, he has had £5M available to him, but has failed in the transfer market.
by Ryn » 19 Sep 2009 17:22
ZacNaloen
I won't be concerned if we aren't winning every game, just as long as we aren't throwing them away like the second half of last year.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Richard and 130 guests